(344) the Association of Ancestry Informative Markers with Experimental Pain Sensitivity

D. Herbstman,X. Mao,M. Shriver,D. Herrera,B. Rahim-Williams,M. Wallace,R. Fillingim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2008.01.267
2008-01-01
Abstract:Among the diverse factors that influence pain perception, it has been well documented that there are differences in the experience of pain across populations. Little work has been done to characterize these differences between human populations on the molecular level. The aim of this study was to use ancestry-informative markers (AIMs) to examine differences in pain experience both within and between population groups. AIMs are the molecular markers with substantially different allele frequencies across populations. Experimental pain measures (heat, cold, pressure, and ischemic) were obtained in 148 participants self-described as either Black/African American (n=36), Hispanic White (n=48), or non-Hispanic White (n=64). We genotyped approximately 100 AIMs to assess individual admixture proportions of the study subjects in terms of West African, European, and Native American populations. We modeled the genetic admixture of individuals using a maximum likelihood method and compared these findings with self-reported “race” group designations. Analysis of variance indicated significant differences in genetic ancestry estimates across self-described ethnic/racial groups, such that non-Hispanic Whites and African Americans showed high levels of European and West African ancestry, respectively. Hispanic White participants were the most genetically diverse group, displaying relatively high degrees of both European and Native American ancestry. Among all the ethnic groups, higher West African and Native American ancestry predicted greater pain sensitivity, while European ancestry was a negative regressor of pain sensitivity. The results of this study indicate that the biogeographical ancestry may help us to characterize the genetic component that contributes to the individual differences in pain sensitivity. We show that genetic ancestry information may be a useful tool in understanding the pain experience, and in the future we may be able to utilize molecular measures of admixture to help elucidate individual differences in pain sensitivity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?