Abstract:Teams of people working together for a common purpose have been a centerpiece of human social organization ever since our ancient ancestors first banded together to hunt game, raise families, and defend their communities. Human history is largely a story of people working together in groups to explore, achieve, and conquer. Yet, the modern concept of work in large organizations that developed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries is largely a tale of work as a collection of individual jobs. A variety of global forces unfolding over the last two decades, however, has pushed organizations worldwide to restructure work around teams, to enable more rapid, flexible, and adaptive responses to the unexpected. This shift in the structure of work has made team effectiveness a salient organizational concern. Teams touch our lives everyday and their effectiveness is important to well-being across a wide range of societal functions. There is over 50 years of psychological research—literally thousands of studies—focused on understanding and influencing the processes that underlie team effectiveness. Our goal in this monograph is to sift through this voluminous literature to identify what we know, what we think we know, and what we need to know to improve the effectiveness of work groups and teams. We begin by defining team effectiveness and establishing the conceptual underpinnings of our approach to understanding it. We then turn to our review, which concentrates primarily on topics that have well-developed theoretical and empirical foundations, to ensure that our conclusions and recommendations are on firm footing. Our review begins by focusing on cognitive, motivational/affective, and behavioral team processes—processes that enable team members to combine their resources to resolve task demands and, in so doing, be effective. We then turn our attention to identifying interventions, or “levers,” that can shape or align team processes and thereby provide tools and applications that can improve team effectiveness. Topic-specific conclusions and recommendations are given throughout the review. There is a solid foundation for concluding that there is an emerging science of team effectiveness and that findings from this research foundation provide several means to improve team effectiveness. In the concluding section, we summarize our primary findings to highlight specific research, application, and policy recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams.

Team Reflexivity Theory:A Literature Review

The Ambivalence Of Trust/Distrust In Innovative Team

Interpersonal Conflict Theory: A Literature Review

Present Situation Analysis of Rresearches on Knowledge Integration Theory in Organization

Research Review on Guanxi Theory

The Dilemma of Trust and Commitment in the Construction of Innovative Team in Chinese Private Enterprises

Does team reflexivity impact teamwork and communication in interprofessional hospital-based healthcare teams? A systematic review and narrative synthesis

A Critical Review of Group Diversity Research: A Reflection Based on the Group Faultlines Theory

Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health Research

Transformational Leadership and Team Transactive Memory System:Mediating Roles of Team Trust and Team Reflexivity

Conceptualising reflexivity within critical discourse of social marketing

Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams

Reflexivity and expansive learning theory in interprofessional workplace learning

Analyzing Social Interaction in Organizations: A Roadmap for Reflexive Choice

Review on Employee Communication in the Research of Team Faultlines

The Effectiveness of Teamwork Training on Teamwork Behaviors and Team Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Interventions

Look Back, Move Forward: A Bibliometric Review of Team Literature

Reviewing and Revisiting the Processes and Emergent States Underlying Team Diversity Effects

The Effects of Team Reflexivity and Gender-Role Attitudes on Female Nurses

Interprofessional Team Conflict Resolution: A Critical Literature Review

Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis