Abstract:Objective— Using a combination of performance measures, we updated previously proposed criteria for identifying physicians whose performance interpreting screening mammograms may indicate suboptimal interpretation skills. Materials and Methods— In this Institutional Review Board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study, six expert breast imagers used a method based on the Angoff approach to update criteria for acceptable mammography performance on the basis of combined performance measures: (Group 1) sensitivity and specificity, for facilities with complete capture of false-negative cancers; and (Group 2) cancer detection rate (CDR), recall rate, and positive predictive value of a recall (PPV 1 ), for facilities that cannot capture false negatives, but have reliable cancer follow-up information for positive mammograms. Decisions were informed by normative data from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC). Results— Updated, combined ranges for acceptable sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography are: (1) sensitivity ≥80% and specificity ≥85% or (2) sensitivity 75–79% and specificity 88–97%. Updated ranges for CDR, recall rate, and PPV 1 are: (1) CDR ≥6/1000, recall rate 3–20%, and any PPV 1 ; (2) CDR 4–6/1000, recall rate 3–15%, and PPV 1 ≥3%; or (3) CDR 2.5–4/1000, recall rate 5–12%, and PPV 1 3–8%. Using the original criteria, 51% of BCSC radiologists had acceptable sensitivity and specificity; 40% had acceptable CDR, recall rate, and PPV 1 . Using the combined criteria, 69% had acceptable sensitivity and specificity and 62% had acceptable CDR, recall rate, and PPV 1 . Conclusion— The combined criteria improve previous criteria by considering the inter-relationships of multiple performance measures and broaden the acceptable performance ranges compared to previous criteria based on individual measures.

Advance in enzymes about senescence and antioxidase of fruit and vegetable

The Advancement on Leaf Senescence in Crops

Role of Antioxidative System During the Development and Senescence of Cucumber Fruit

Relationship Between Ripening and Senescence of Fruits and Antioxidase

Research progress in protein oxidation in muscle foods

Advances in Molecular Mechanisms of Abscisic Acid-Regulated Ripening of Non-Climacteric Fruit.

Proteomic Studies on Fruit Ripening and Senescence

Maturity-dependent chilling tolerance regulated by the antioxidative capacity in postharvest cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) fruits.

Research Progress in Effect of Protein Oxidation on Meat Aging

Effect of Triadimefon on Anti-Oxidative Enzymes Activity in Cucumber Cotyledons

A Survey Research on Healthy Function and Antioxidant Activity of Natural Antioxidants

Senescence-specific Change in ROS Scavenging Enzyme Activities and Regulation of Various SOD Isozymes to ROS Levels in Psf Mutant Rice Leaves.

CD4 T cells specific for factor VIII are present at high frequency in healthy donors and comprise naïve and memory cells.

LEAF SENESCENCE AND PROTECTIVE ENZYME ACTIVITIES OF A XANTHA MUTANT RICE(Oryza sativa L.)

Variation In Antioxidant Metabolites And Enzymes Of 'Red Fuji' Apple Pulp And Peel During Cold Storage

Effect of Exogenous Oxalic Acid Treatment on Ripening and Preservation of Annona squamosa L. Fruits during Postharvest Storage

Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidants in Postharvest Vegetables and Fruits

Research Advance in Regulation of Ethylene During Ripening and Senescence of Non-climacteric Fruit

Phosphorylation of MdWRKY70L by MdMPK6/02G mediates reactive oxygen synthesis to regulate apple fruit senescence

Criteria for Identifying Radiologists with Acceptable Screening Mammography Interpretive Performance based on Multiple Performance Measures

The role of redox-active small molecules and oxidative protein post-translational modifications in seed aging