Oral L-Arginine Supplementation In Acute Myocardial Infarction Therapy: A Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials

Tao Sun,Wen-Bai Zhou,Xin-Ping Luo,Yao-Liang Tang,Hai-Ming Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20616
2009-01-01
Clinical Cardiology
Abstract:Objective: The objective was to analyze completed trials assessing the effect of oral L-arginine supplementation on clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Background: Prior trials suggest that oral L-arginine administration improves endothelial function in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). However, it is still unclear whether oral supplementation of L-arginine has any effect on clinical outcomes in patients with unstable CAD, such as AMI.Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, reviews, and reference lists of relevant articles. The search strategy paired the term "arginine" with the following: "coronary heart disease," "myocardial infarction," "cardiovascular disease," ischemia," and "trial." We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled L-arginine supplementation trials that evaluated clinical outcomes in AMI patients. Two reviewers independently assessed the trials. Differences were resolved by consensus.Results: Only 2 trials (927 participants) were included. None of the 2 studies showed a significant difference in event rate between the L-arginine and placebo groups. In an overall pooled estimate, there was a 7% reduction in mortality in the L-arginine treatment group (105/459, 22.9%) compared with the control group (111/455, 24.4%), which did not reach statistical significance (risk ratio [RR]: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-1-17; P = 0.54).Conclusion: Oral L-arginine supplementation has no effect on the clinical outcomes of patients with AMI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?