Abstract:When generalizing the projection-valued measurements to the positive operator-valued measurements, the notion of the quantum logic generalizes from the sharp quantum logic to the unsharp quantum logic. It is known that: (i) the distributive law is one of the main differences between the sharp quantum logic and the boolean logic, and the block or the center of the sharp quantum structures are boolean algebras; (ii) the unsharp quantum logic does not satisfy the non-contradiction law, which forces the block or the center of unsharp quantum structures to be multiple valued algebras, rather than boolean algebras. Multiple valued algebras, as special quantum structures, are the algebraic semantics of multiple valued logic. Interestingly, we recently discovered that the difference between some unsharp quantum structures and multiple valued algebras is also some kind of distributive law. Choosing an orthomodular lattice (an algebraic model of a sharp quantum logic) to be the truth valued lattice, Ying et al. have systematically developed automata theory based on sharp quantum logic. In this paper, choosing a lattice ordered quantum multiple valued algebra E (an extended lattice ordered effect algebra E, respectively) to be the truth valued lattice, we also systematically develop an automata theory based on unsharp quantum logic. We introduce E-valued finite-state automata and E-valued pushdown automata in the framework of unsharp quantum logic. We study the classes of languages accepted by these automata and re-examine their various properties in the framework of unsharp quantum logic. The study includes the equivalence between finite-state automata and regular expressions, as well as the equivalence between pushdown automata and context-free grammars. It is also demonstrated that the universal validity of some important properties (such as some closure properties of languages and Kleene theorem etc.) depends heavily on the aforementioned distributive law. More precisely, when the underlying model degenerates into an MV algebra, then all the counterparts of properties in classical automata are valid. This is the main difference between automata theory based on unsharp quantum logic and automata theory based on sharp quantum logic.

The Computing Power of Turing Machine Based on Quantum Logic

Computing Power of Turing Machines in the Framework of Unsharp Quantum Logic

Turing Machines Based on Unsharp Quantum Logic *

A Theory of Computation Based on Quantum Logic (I)

Quantum Iterative Deepening with an application to the Halting problem

A theory of computation based on unsharp quantum logic: Finite state automata and pushdown automata

Lattice-Valued Fuzzy Turing Machines And Their Computing Power

An Unsharp Logic from Quantum Computation

Lattice-valued fuzzy Turing machines: Computing power, universality and efficiency

Toward a Universal Quantum Computer

Finite Automata Based on Quantum Logic and Their Determinization

The Power of Qutrit Logic for Quantum Computation

Entangling Power in Deterministic Quantum Computation with One Qubit

Limitations of Noisy Quantum Devices in Computational and Entangling Power

Computability Theory of Closed Timelike Curves

A Schematic Definition of Quantum Polynomial Time Computability

A Logic for Recursive Quantum Programs.

Quantum Computing with Time-travelling Quantum Gates

Power of Quantum Computation with Few Clean Qubits

Computable and noncomputable in the quantum domain: statements and conjectures

Logic Synthesis of Ternary Quantum Circuits with Minimal Qutrits