Quantitive evaluation of coronary artery stenosis and in-stent restenosis by 64-slice spiral CT angiography and DSA
Tian-long HUO,Xiang-ke DU,Jing-min LIAO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1005-1201.2007.10.008
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reliability for coronary artery stenosis and in-stent restenosis detection using 64-slice spiral computed tomography (multislice CT, MSCT) angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Methods: A pulsating cardiac phantom with two simulated coronary arteries was scanned on a 64- slice CT scanner and underwent DSA at static state, at 4 different sinus rhythms of 0, 50, 70, and 90 beats per minute (bpm). One simulated artery was 3 mm in lumen diameter with 3 segments of 25%, 50%, and 75% stenoses. A stent with 2 segments of 50% and 75% stenoses was placed into the other artery with 4mm in lumen diameter. Images from MSCT were analyzed and compared with those from DSA. Results: (1) The mean values of the 25%, 50%, and 75% stenoses measured with MSCT were (30.0 ± 1.4)%, (49.5 ± 1.3)%, and (72.9 ± 3.9)%, respectively (P values were 0.005, 0.531, and 0.369 respectively). The mean values of the 25%, 50%, and 75% stenoses measured with DSA were (24.8 ± 2.0)%, (48.2 ± 2.1)%, (75.3 ± 2.4)% respectively (P values were 0.883, 0.180, and 0.796, respectively). (2) MSCT was susceptible to heart rate, with artifact increasing as heart rate increasing, especially when the heart rate were ≥70 bpm. (3) There was a good correlation between 64-slice MSCT and DSA (r = 0.995, P = 0.000). (4) 64-slice MSCT could show the stent and in- stent restenosis simutaneously. Its capability to depict in-stent restenosis was limited. The depiction rate of 50% in- stent restenosis were (46.4 ± 4.5) % (0 bpm) and (43.6 ± 5.7)% (50 bpm) respectively (P < 0. 05). DSA could depict the in-stent stenosis but could not show the morphology of the stent. Conclusion: 64-slice MSCT is reliable in detecting coronary artery stenosis. MSCT has clinical application value due to its non-invasive nature. Even though its capability is somewhat limited in depicting in-stent restenosis, MSCT is promising in the cases when vessel caliber is relatively large and heart rate is relatively low.