The Relationship between Different Delivery Timing and the Outcome of Premature Rupture of Membranes in Primiparous Women
Xueling Zhang,Zhexia Hu,Jingya Li,Biyun Luo,Lishe Chen,Min Xu
2024-06-05
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the relationship between different delivery timing and the outcome of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) in primiparous women. Methods: Within the context of exploring optimal delivery strategies for managing PROM, we conducted a retrospective study at Shijiazhuang Fourth Hospital. From May 2019 to May 2022, a total of 400 single pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at different gestational weeks (28-36 weeks) were enrolled. This study aims to understand the impact of delivery timing on pregnancy outcomes more clearly. Pregnant women were divided into two distinct groups based on gestational weeks: Group A (28 to 33 weeks, n=192) and Group B (34 to 36 weeks, n=208). The clinical data of pregnant women were analyzed retrospectively, and the methods of delivery, maternal and infant pregnancy outcomes, and factors affecting delivery outcomes were compared in different groups. Results: Compared with the delivery methods of the two groups, the proportion of vaginal delivery in group A (69.27%) was significantly higher than that in group B (49.04%). The proportion of assisted vaginal delivery and cesarean section (13.54% and 17.19%) was significantly lower than that in group B (18.75% and 32.21%) (P < .001). There was no difference in neonatal death outcomes between the two groups (P > .297). The incidence of chorioamnionitis, postpartum hemorrhage, and puerperal infection in group A (25.00%), (19.27%) and (11.46%) was significantly higher than that in group B (6.25%), (5.29%) and (2.40%), respectively. The incidence rates of neonatal asphyxia, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS), and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) in group A were 9.38%, 7.29%, and 6.77%, which were significantly higher than those in group B (1.92%, 0.48% and 0.48%) (P = .001). There was no difference in neonatal death outcomes at different delivery times (P = .259). The incidence rates of amniotic infection, postpartum hemorrhage, and puerperal infection were (3.98%), (7.39%) and (3.41%), which were significantly lower than those of pregnant women from PROM to delivery time ≥48 h (24.11%), (15.63%) and (9.38%). The incidence rates of neonatal asphyxia, NRDS, and HIE were (1.14%), (1.14%) and (2.27%) in neonates from PROM to delivery time < 48 h, significantly lower than those in neonates from PROM to delivery time ≥48 h (8.93%), (5.80%), and (4.46%) (P < .001). Logistic regression analysis showed that the older the gestational week was the protective factor for amniotic space infection, postpartum hemorrhage, puerperal infection, neonatal asphyxia, NRDS, and HIE. Late delivery time was an independent risk factor for amniotic cavity infection(P < .001), postpartum hemorrhage(P = .014), puerperal infection(P = .023), neonatal asphyxia(P = .004), and NRDS (P = .028). Conclusion: In pregnant women with PROM who are not at full term, a greater gestational week is associated with a lower rate of adverse delivery outcomes. In contrast, a longer time interval between membrane rupture and delivery is associated with a higher rate of adverse delivery outcomes.