Eco-environmental Water Requirement Based on Scheme of Wetland Restoration in Hengshui National Nature Reserve

LI Cong,WANG Ji,LI Xiaowen,BAI Junhong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2009.05.008
2009-01-01
Abstract:On the basis of three different plans for wetland restoration,which were:1)to focus on wetland restoration and regard habitat alteration as auxiliary task;2)to center upon habitat alteration and give attention to wetland restoration;3)to pay equal attention to both habitat alteration and wetland restoration,we designed three corresponding schemes under the condition of PRC South to North Water Project.By using eco-hydrological method,we calculated the smallest eco-environmental water requirement,sustaining the basic ecological functions of wetland ecosystem,which mainly included wetland plant,wetland soil,groundwater recharge,water habitat and pollutant dilution.Through comparison,we evaluated present condition and the three schemes, which laid a scientific foundation and gave decision-making support to the development planning of the reserve.The results indicated that scheme 2 put the least pressure on water resource,while scheme 3 put the most.The area of open water in Scheme 1 reached 7 207.32 hm2 and became the largest open water habitat,and that of scheme 2 and scheme 3 were 3 695.62ha and 7 013.72ha respectively,which entirely exceeded the eco-environmental water requirement of present status. The area of reed marsh were 2 227.91ha,2 522.26ha and 2 235.21ha in scheme 1,2 and 3 respectively,while that of present situation was 2 399.67 ha.Accordingly,the general wetland area of the three schemes was 108,42 and 118 percentage points higher than their present sizes respectively.In conclusion,viewing from the point of eco-environmental water requirement,the scheme of centering upon habitat alteration and giving attention to wetland restoration was the optimal choice,for it demanded the least eco-environmental water and held the largest reed marsh habitat.By contrast,the scheme of paying equal attention to both habitat alteration and wetland restoration was the least suitable,because its water body was less than that of scheme 1,but its restored meadow consumed higher eco-environmental water requirement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?