Abstract:Background:Epidural anesthesia used in percutaneous endoscopic lumber discectomy (PELD) has the risk of complete neurotactile block. Patients cannot timely respond to the operator when the nerve is touched by mistake, so the potential risk of nerve injury cannot be avoided. According to pharmacodynamics, with the decrease of local anesthetic concentration, the nerve tactile gradually recovered; however, the analgesic effect also gradually weakened. Therefore, it is necessary to explore an appropriate concentration of local anesthetics that can keep the patients' nerve touch without pain. By comparing the advantages and disadvantages of 0.4% ropivacaine epidural anesthesia, local anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia on intraoperative circulation fluctuation, the incidence of salvage analgesia and the incidence of nerve non-touch, the feasibility of using low concentration epidural anesthesia in PELD to obtain enough analgesia and avoid the risk of nerve injury was confirmed.Methods:153 cases of intervertebral foramen surgery from October 2017 to January 2020 were selected and divided into local anesthesia group (LA group), 0.4% ropivacaine epidural anesthesia group (EA group), and intravenous anesthesia group (IVA group) according to different anesthesia methods. The changes of blood pressure and heart rate, the incidence of rescue analgesia and nerve root non-touch were compared among the three groups.Results:The difference of map peak value among the three groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001); pairwise comparison showed that the map peak value of the LA group was higher than that of the EA group (P < 0.001) and IVA group (P < 0.001), but there was no statistical significance between the EA group and IVA group. The difference of HR peak value among the three groups was statistically significant; pairwise comparison showed that the HR peak value of the LA group was higher than that of the EA group (P < 0.001) and IVA group (P < 0.001), but there was no statistical significance between the EA group and IVA group. There was significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative hypertension among the three groups (P < 0.05); pairwise comparison showed that the incidence of intraoperative hypertension in the EA group was lower than that in the LA group (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference between the IVA group, EA group, and LA group. There was significant difference in the incidence of rescue analgesia among the three groups (P < 0.01); pairwise comparison showed that the incidence of rescue analgesia in the EA group was lower than that in the LA group (P < 0.05) and IVA group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the LA group and IVA group. Due to the different analgesic mechanisms of the three anesthesia methods, local anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia do not cause the loss of nerve tactile, while the incidence of nerve tactile in 0.4% ropivacaine epidural anesthesia is only 2.4%, which is still satisfactory.Conclusion:Epidural anesthesia with 0.4% ropivacaine is a better anesthesia method for PELD. It not only has a low incidence of non-tactile nerve, but also has perfect analgesia and more stable intraoperative circulation.

Comparison of analgesic effects between ropivacaine and lidocaine after functional endoscopic sinus surgery

Effect Analysis of Epidural Anesthesia with 0.4% Ropivacaine in Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery.

Effects of Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine on Isoflurane Consumption and Postoperative Pain in Patients Underwent Nasal Endoscopy Surgery

Comparison of postoperative analgesia in children following ropivacaine and lidocaine surgical field infiltration with epinephrine for cleft palate repair: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Local Anesthesia for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Employing Small Volumes of Epinephrine‐containing Solutions of Lidocaine Produces Profound Hypotension

Effects of Compound Lidocaine Cream on Postoperative Pain After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Comparison of the effects of perioperative intravenous infusions of esmolol and lidocaine on the quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study

Research on the Analgesic Effect of Ropivacaine for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Application of dexmedetomidine combined with intranasal compound lidocaine cream in functional endoscopic sinus surgery

Comparison between ropivacaine or bupivacaine combined with fentanyl respectively for postoperative continuous epidural analgesia

Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Ropivacaine for Laparoscopy-Assisted Infiltration Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

[Effects of Preincisional Epidural Administration of Lidocaine and Fentanyl on Postoperative Pain Management Following Hysterectomy].

Clinical anesthetic effects of epidural ropivacaine with sufentanyl

Effect of Fentanyl on Efficacy of Low-Dose Ropivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Anorectal Surgery

A Prospective, Randomised, Double-Masked Comparison of Local Anaesthetic Agents for Vitrectomy.

Comparison of Efficacy Outcomes of Lidocaine Spray, Topical Lidocaine Injection, and Lidocaine General Anesthesia in Nasal Bone Fractures Surgeries: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Effect of Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Propofol-remifentanil on Stress Reaction and Anesthetic Recovery for Patients with Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Effects of Different Drugs on Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Variceal Ligation

Can Ropivacaine Be Effectively and Safely Used in Analgesia after Laparoscopically Assisted Gastrointestinal Surgery?

Analgesic Effects of Medications Via Intraperitoneal Injection at the End of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Comparison of effects of lidocaine spray and gel on cardiovascular responses at endotracheal intubation and extubation