Heat and Water Transfer Processes on the Typical Underlying Surfaces of Frozen Soil in Cold Regions(Ⅰ):Model Comparison

YANG Yong,CHEN Ren-sheng,YE Bai-sheng,SONG Yao-xuan,LIU Jun-feng,HAN Chun-tan,LIU Zhang-wen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2013.0171
2013-01-01
Abstract:Measurement and estimation of soil water content and soil temperature are the foundation of research on water and heat transfer processes of frozen soil,which are the important base and core link of water cycle in cold regions.To study the heat and water transfer processes on various underlying surfaces in cold regions,four research sites, covered with(1)alpine grassland(38°16′ N, 99°52′E,2 980ma.s.l.,seasonally frozen soil),(2)alpine meadow(38°15′N,99°52′E,3 380m a.s.l.,seasonally frozen soil),(3)alpine swampy meadow(38°13′N,99°53′E,3 710ma.s.l.,permafrost)and(4)alpine clod desert(38°13′N, 99°53′E,4 167ma.s.l.,permafrost),were chosen.Four automatic weather stations were installed in each research sites to collect meteorological data.With the observed meteorological data and measured soil and vegetation properties, SHAW and CoupModel were introduced to simulate the transfer processes of energy and water in the sites.A comparison between the calculated from SHAW and measured soil water content and soil temperature shows that the R2 value is 0.65 and 0.90,and the R2 value between calculated from CoupModel and measurement is 0.72and 0.93.It is found that CoupModel is an 1-D SVATs model better than SHAW for various underlying surfaces in cold regions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?