Abstract:The continuous increase of digital documents on the web creates the need to search for information patterns that allow the categorization of organizational documents to generate knowledge in an institution. An Artificial Intelligence technique for this purpose is text classification, it for its application uses labels (previously categorized documents) with supervised (with labels) or unsupervised (without labels) training models. Both traditional models with their advantages and disadvantages have been joined into semi-supervised models that extract the best qualities of each one, however, the labeling process involves resources and time that try to be optimized to improve classification accuracy. An analysis of the different semi-supervised models would show us the advantages of their training and the way how the structure of each of them affects the accuracy of their classification. In the present study, a classification structure of the semi-supervised models in the classification of documents is proposed to analyze their qualities and categorization process, through an SLR (Revision of systematic literature) that extracts performance metrics from the identified studies to perform a meta-analysis through forest plots. To define the search strategy for studies, the PICOC (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outputs, Context) method has been used, it is supported by the research question defines a search string, which has allowed the collection of 228 research, these are filtered with the PRISMA declaration method and the determination of exclusion criteria, in this way 35 researches are selected for the present study. The analysis of the selected studies identifies a structure for the different semi-supervised learning models, and a scheme of their work process is obtained, it has been used to extract advantages, disadvantages, and performance metrics. Through a meta-analysis with forest diagrams, the classification accuracy performance of the researches in each learning model is evaluated, determining as results that regardless of the characteristics of its process, active learning (0.89) and assembled learning (0.83) present the best performance levels.

A Survey of Semi-supervised Text Categonzation

Improving semi-supervised text classification by using wikipedia knowledge

A survey on semi-supervised learning

A Survey on Deep Semi-Supervised Learning

A survey of multi-label classification based on supervised and semi-supervised learning

Semi-Supervised Text Classification Using Positive and Unlabeled Data

Semi-supervised Classification for Natural Language Processing

Semi-supervised learning models for document classification: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Language Independent Text Categorization.

A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learning

A Survey on Text Classification: From Traditional to Deep Learning

An Evaluation System for Algorithms of Automated Text Categorization on Chinese

SSXCS:Semi-supervised learning classifier system

Application Of The Character-Level Statistical Method In Text Categorization

Supervised Text Classification using Text Search

Text Categorization Techniques and Current Trends

Cooperative Hybrid Semi-Supervised Learning For Text Sentiment Classification

A Review of Semi Supervised Learning Theories and Recent Advances

Machine learning in automated text categorization

Deep Categorization with Semi-Supervised Self-Organizing Maps

A Semi-Supervised Learning Financial News Classification Algorithm