Correlation between the waveform changes of hepatic veins in patients with chronic hepatitis tested by color Doppler ultrasonography and the staging of liver fibrosis
MENG Fan-kun,ZHENG Ying,GE Hui-yu,LI Fang,XU Ce,DING Lei,CAO Hai-gen,孟繁坤,郑颖,葛辉玉,李芳,徐策,丁蕾,曹海根
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1004-4477.2006.04.015
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the correlation between the waveform changes of hepatic vein in patients with chronic hepatitis and the staging of pathological liver fibrosis. Methods The waveform changes of hepatic vein of 602 patients with chronic hepatitis were tested with color Doppler ultrasonography and comparatively analyzed with staging of pathological liver fibrosis. All the cases were identified by the liver pathological biopsy introduced with ultrasound. Results The waveform of hepatic vein of the patients shows three types, such as bi-directional waveform, unidirectional waveform, and completely flat (portal-like) waveform, and they were divided into mild (S0-S1), medium (S2-S3), and severity (S4) according to staging of pathological liver fibrosis. There was significant difference between mild and severity, but no significant difference between medium and severity. The bi-directional waveform was defined as normal waveform, but the unidirectional waveform and completely flat waveform defined as abnormal waveform. There was no significant difference among adjacent stages of fibrosis as well as between normal waveform and abnormal waveform, but only a significant difference between S1 and S4. The staging of no fibrosis (S0) was defined as the control group and the staging of fibrosis (S1-S4) defined as the patient group. The sensitivity of abnormal waveforms in diagnosing fibrosis was 17.3 %(97/559), the specificity was 90.7 %(39/43), the diagnostic accurate rate was 34.2 %(136/602), and there were 12 cases ( 8.2 %) with false positive and 462 cases ( 82.6 %) with the false negative. There was no statistical significance in the differences of flows of s peak value between the unidirectional waveform and the bi-directional waveform a, and a statistical significance in the differences of flows of a peak value between S0 and S4, S1 and S4, S2 and S4, and S3 and S4, but no statistical significance between S0 and S1, S1 and S2, and S2 and S3. Based on the ROC analysis, the limit value of a peak value was 8 cm/s. Its sensitivity in diagnosing S4 was 40.6 %, and specificity was 51.3 %. Conclusions The flow of peak value of the unidirectional waveform is not always decreased. The waveform pattern of hepatic vein and flow of a peak value have no definite diagnostic significance at S3 and below, but have a great value in the diagnosis of S4. The sensitivity of a peak value flow is higher than that of the waveform pattern. So, attention should be paid to the changes of a peak value flow in the diagnosis of liver fibrosis. The waveform changes of hepatic vein tested by color Doppler ultrasonography have a definite value in the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in the patients with chronic liver disease.