Abstract:Local governments have the authority to implement emergency management and are the primary responders in emergencies. They are strategically positioned to lead the charge in disaster response. Similar to other wicked problems, disasters require comprehensive and complicated responses. Local emergency management networks facilitate the exchange of information and resources between local entities and their collaborating partners. Successful collaboration across local governments is imperative in unexpected and urgent incidents. This paper applies the institutional collective action (ICA) framework to investigate the effects of relational risk and vulnerability on the formation of networks. The relational risk perceived by each collaborative organisation and the vulnerability of the community are crucial factors in the establishment and maintenance of collaborative networks. In addition, the need for resource exchange also affects the formation of networks. Logistic regression estimates the effect of collaboration risk and vulnerability on network formation using data from the 2015 Seoul EM survey. The findings confirm that the perceived collaboration risk negatively influences the establishment of collaborative ties in networks, while the perceived vulnerability level positively affects the arrangement of collaborative networks. In addition, the respondent's need for resource exchange increases when building networks. These results imply that relieving the relational risk levels is important for facilitating inter‐organisational collaboration. Furthermore, the actors' assessments of the vulnerability of the community influence their willingness to join networks to relieve external uncertainty and susceptibility. Lastly, organisations' give‐and‐take relationships on information sharing and physical resource transmission have the potential to stimulate the establishment of collaborative networks. Points for practitioners Sustainable interconnectedness among functionally and horizontally fragmented organisations is crucial for dealing with disasters efficiently, but it does not come solely from emergency management planning itself. Understanding the risk mechanism embedded in an interdependent relationship should increase the potential benefits of a successful response. The degree of vulnerability in a community affects the level of risk perception when collaborating with other organisations. Beyond the internal capacity or assessment of their organisation, how they view their community in general influences their decision‐making differently when it comes to forging inter‐relational collaboration. Resource sharing in a timely manner is crucial during disasters. Each organisation has different negotiating powers and needs to consider building interdependent relationships.

Cross-organization Collaboration in Natural Disaster Management:From the Perspective of Social Vulnerabilities

Risk of Cross-Sector Cooperation Based on Network Structure and Relationship

Thinking on Early Warning Mechanism of Meteorological Disasters and Social Emergency Response

Examining Organizational Collaboration and Resource Flows of Disaster Response System Based on a Time-Dynamic Perspective

Collaboration risk, vulnerability, and resource sharing in disaster management networks

The Emergence of an Adaptive Response Network: the April 20, 2013 Lushan, China Earthquake

A Study on the Mechanism and Strategy of Cross-Regional Emergency Cooperation for Natural Disasters in China-Based on the Perspective of Evolutionary Game Theory

Patterns Of Interorganizational Collaboration In The Natural Disaster Response In China: A Case Study On Organizational Response Network Of The Ya'An Earthquake In 2013

Research on cross-city emergency management collaboration mechanism in major emergencies: insights from a knowledge management perspective

Exploring Complex Adaptive Networks in the Aftermath of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake in China

Driving the effectiveness of public health emergency management strategies through cross-departmental collaboration: Configuration analysis based on 15 cities in China

Civil Service and Civil Society Collaboration: A Comparative Analysis of Disaster Management Results in China and the United States

Research on the Collaborative Relationship of Task-Driven Urban Earthquake Emergency Organizations

Study on the Systematic Integration of Community Disaster Preparedness and Community Governance Based on Synergistic Multi-Agen

Embeddedness in cross-agency collaboration and emergency management capability: Evidence from Shanghai's urban contingency plans

RESEARCH ON THE WAY OF SHARING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION DATA IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT

Collaborative Disaster Management: Lessons from Taiwan’s Local Governments

Key Factors and Coupling Relationships of Collaborative Governance for Disaster Prevention in China's Coastal Cities

Understanding the Collaborative Process and Its Effects on Perceived Outcomes during Emergency Response in China: From Perspectives of Local Government Sectors

Inter-organizational collaboration after institutional reform in China: A perspective based on the revision of the emergency plan

Understanding the Causes of Vulnerabilities for Enhancing Social-Physical Resilience: Lessons from the Wenchuan Earthquake