Raman spectroscopy for wine analyses: A comparison with near and mid infrared spectroscopy
Cláudia A. Teixeira dos Santos,Ricardo N.M.J. Páscoa,Patrícia A.L.S. Porto,António L. Cerdeira,J.M. González-Sáiz,C. Pizarro,João A. Lopes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.04.075
IF: 6.1
2018-08-01
Talanta
Abstract:Routine wine analysis are commonly employed to ensure the quality and safety standards, and to meet consumers' demands and legal requirements. In the last decades, efforts have been done in order to replace the traditional analytical techniques by vibrational spectroscopic techniques such as near infrared (NIR) and mid infrared (MIR) spectroscopy. The potential of these techniques has already been proved by several studies that revealed their ability for the determination of several wine parameters with high levels of precision and accuracy. Raman spectroscopy, (which is also a vibrational technique), was much less explored in the wine industry. In this work, the ability of Raman spectroscopy for routine wine analysis was evaluated and compared to NIR and MIR spectroscopy. Several calibration models were developed aiming the quantitative assessment of alcoholic strength, density, total acidity, volatile acidity, total sugars and pH in white wines. For this purpose, partial least squares (PLS) regression was employed, enabling the correlation between reference results and spectral information obtained by NIR, MIR and Raman spectroscopy. Results revealed the better performance of MIR spectroscopy for the measurement of alcoholic strength (R<sup>2</sup><sub>P</sub> = 0.99, RMSEP=1.77%, and RER=56.41), and total acidity (R<sup>2</sup><sub>P</sub> = 0.98, RMSEP=2.02%, and RER=49.46). Raman spectroscopy was pointed out as the most suitable for the determination of total sugars (R<sup>2</sup><sub>P</sub> = 0.97, RMSEP=5.12%, RER=19.52), and pH (R<sup>2</sup><sub>P</sub> = 0.90, RMSEP=4.92%, RER=20.34). The three techniques presented similar results in what referred the assessment of density (R<sup>2</sup><sub>P</sub> = 0.96, 0.98, and 0.97, RMSEP=4.72%, 3.90%, and 3.80%, for Raman, MIR, and NIR respectively). None of the three techniques seemed to be suitable for the accurate determination of volatile acidity (R<sup>2</sup><sub>P</sub> <0.78, RMSEP>14.32%, and RER<6.98).
chemistry, analytical