Comparison of GyneFix330 intrauterine device with TCu220C and TCu380A intrauterine devices:A systematic review

Zhang Lei,Zhang Yan,Li Min,Mao Yanyan,Che Yan,Zhou Weijin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2011.1
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To explore the effectiveness,side effects,and the continuation rates of GyneFix330 and TCu220C and TCu380A intrauterine devices(IUDs).Methods:Electronic and hand searches were used to identify relevant literature published in Chinese and English between January 1990 and November 2009.Relevant papers were evaluated and selected according to the criteria of evidence-based medicine.Results:A total of twenty-six randomized controlled clinical trials(RCTs)were included in this review.Compared with TCu220C IUD,GyneFix330 IUD had lower expulsion and pregnancy rates with IUD in situ at 12 months and 24 months of use;while it was less likely to introduce prolonged menstrual bleeding,heavy menstrual bleeding,irregular vaginal bleeding and low back-abdominal pain during 6,12 and 24 months of the observation,and lower rate of discontinuation due to medical reasons and higher continuation rate at 12 months of use.The one-year,two-year,three-year and nine-year pregnancy rates with IUD in situ of both GyneFix330 and TCu380A IUDs were lower than 2.50 per hundred women.The likelihood of increasing duration of menstrual bleeding,heavy menstrual bleeding and irregular vaginal bleeding was similar between GyneFix330 and TCu380A IUDs.The removal rate due to medical reasons of GyneFix330 IUD was similar to that of TCu380A IUD.However,the continuation rate of GyneFix330 IUD was slightly higher than its counterpart.Conclusion:The effectiveness,side effects and continuation rate of GyneFix330 IUD were similar to those of TCu380A IUD.These measurements were demonstrated to be better for Gynefix330 IUD than for TCu220C IUD.However,more large-scale RCTs with high quality of research need to be done to confirm this conclusion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?