Comparison of laryngeal mask ventilation anesthesia, epidural anesthesia and spinal anesthesia in cesarean section

SONG Cundi,QIU Yimin,HUANG Xiaojing,ZHU Hui,WANG Zhengping
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the effect of laryngeal mask ventilation anesthesia, epidural anesthesia and spinal anesthesia on neonatal and maternal postoperative recovery. Methods Ninety patients scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomly divided into general anesthesia group, epidural anesthesia group and spinal anesthesia group. General anesthesia was induced with vecuronium 2 mg, ketamine 30-40mg, propofol 1.0 mg/kg, succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg by intravenous injection in order. Then a laryngeal mask was intubated. Sevoflurane 1.0%-1.5% in oxygen was administered to maintain anesthesia. Fentanyl, midazolam and Tramal were appropriately given after delivery. We collected blood samples from umbilical artery after delivery for blood gas analysis, and recorded 1-min and 5-min Apgar scores and numerical rating scale 1 h and 24 h (NRS1 and NRS24) after surgery, and neonatal behavioral neurological assessment (NBNA) 1 d, 2 d, 3 d and 5 d after birth in all newborns. Anesthesia awareness during surgery, nausea and vomiting, breast-feeding and gastrointestinal function recovery were observed during the follow up. Results There were no significant differences in Apgar scores or NBNA 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, 5 d among the three groups (all P>0.05). Neither were the starting time of breast-feeding and intestinal recovery ventilation time (all P>0.05). All the results of umbilical arterial blood gas analysis were within the normal range. NRS1 of all the parturients were less than 3. NRS1 in general anesthesia group was significantly lower than those in the other two groups (both P<0.01). Conclusion Laryngeal mask in general anesthesia is safe for cesarean section, with no adverse effects on newborns and maternal postoperative recovery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?