VIRIOPLANKTON ABUNDANCE IN WINTER AND SPRING IN CHANGJIANG RIVER ESTUARY BY FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPE COUNTING

BAI Xiao-Ge,WANG Min,MA Jing-Jing,SUN Jun,LIANG Yan-Tao,QIAO Qian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0029-814X.2007.04.012
2007-01-01
Abstract:In most aquatic environments, virioplankton is the most abundant plankton class. Virioplankton promotes the release of dissolved organic material and the regeneration of inorganic nutrients. It plays an important part in influencing the size structure of community and the pathways of material and energy transport in marine ecosystem. To study the distribution and seasonal variation of virioplankton in Changjiang (Yangtze) River estuary, virioplankton abundance in February (winter) and May 2006 (spring) was studied in the estuary. In this study, virioplankon was quantified by using fluorescent microscope. The samples were collected using Rossette into 50ml sterilized vials, fixed by formaldehyde (3.5%, final concentration) and then stored at 4℃ for counting virioplankton. The data was analyzed with the statistic method of independent t-test and the unitary linear regression analysis. Result show that the range of virus abundance was 0.490—19.2 and 0.821—21.9 (×106 viruses/ml) in the winter and spring respectively. No significant seasonal but geographical variation in virioplankton abundance was found. Using virus direct count by fluorescent microscope to represent the abundance, we found that the virus count in the estuary was 107/ml significantly higher than that of in the offshore area at 106/ml (P<0.01), due probably to that nutrient concentrations in the estuary were much higher than that in the offshore area. In vertical direction, the distribution of the viral abundance varied with the site depth. In shallow water (<10-m depth) areas, no significant change in virus concentration was found, whereas in deeper regions (>10-m depth), the virus concentration decrease with depth. In season, virioplankton abundance was positively in winter but negatively in spring correlated with chlorophyll a concentration significantly (P<0.05).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?