Methotrexate versus sulfasalazine in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis

ZHAO Fu-tao,ZHAO Hao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2007.08.057
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of both methotrexate (MTX) and sulfasalazine (SSZ) in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) by chronically observing the clinical effects of the two agents. Methods 120 patients with AS were randomized to receive MTX (MTX group,n=60) or SSZ (SSZ group,n=60) under the basic treatment with one kind of NSAIDs,and were followed for three years. The data including symptoms and signs,Bath AS disease activity index (BASDAI),Bath AS functional index (BASFI),ESR,and CRP,along with the adverse events,were documented. Results As compared with those documented at the time of admission,lumbosacralgia was evidently relieved (P < 0.05),the duration of morning stiffness was markedly shortened (P < 0.05),BASDAI and BASFI were obviously declined (P < 0.05),and the inflammatory markers ESR and CRP were significantly decreased (P < 0.05) in the two treatment groups on the first,second,and third year of follow-up. However,there were no notable differences between these groups. The major adverse events included gastrointestinal responses and leucopenia. Fewer gastrointestinal responses occurred in MTX group than in SSZ group (5% vs 12%,P < 0.05) while leucopenia did not differ notably between the two groups. No impaired hematopoiesis was found during three-year of follow-up. Conclusion MTX is as effective as SSZ in the treatment of AS. However,it has fewer side effects and is more tolerable,and its more chronic efficacy and safety needs to be further observed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?