Abstract:A considerable number of studies have identified selective attentional biases toward food-related information in restrained eaters. However, to date, the nature of information-processing biases that differentiate successful from unsuccessful restrained eaters has yet to be clarified. Based on Stroebe’s (2008) goal conflict model of eating, the current study was designed to investigate components of attentional bias among successful restrained eaters, unsuccessful restrained eaters, and non-restrained eaters under two conditions: a hedonic goal condition and a restrained goal condition. We hypothesized that within the hedonic goal condition, rapid avoidance would be observed in successful restrained eaters and disengagement difficulties would be displayed among unsuccessful restrained eaters. Conversely, within the restrained goal condition, rapid avoidance of palatable food cues would be present within both categories of restrained eating. From an initial sample of 907 Chinese undergraduate women, we recruited 60 successful restrained eaters, 60 unsuccessful restrained eaters and 60 non-restrained eaters based on scoring cut-offs from the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (van Strien et al., 1986; 2007) to participate in dot probe research. In Experiment 1, a hedonic goal was activated prior to the dot probe task that featured palatable and neutral cues. Results of 3 (Group) × 3 (Prime Location) × 2 (Food Palatability) analyses of variance indicated disengagement difficulties related to palatable food cues among unsuccessful restrained eaters, rapid avoidance of these cues among successful restrained eaters, and no biases in responses to palatability cues among non-restrained eaters. In Experiment 2, a restrained goal was activated subliminally following hedonic goal activation before the dot probe task. Among unsuccessful restrained eaters, disengagement difficulties and rapid avoidance of palatable food cues. In successful restrained eaters, only rapid avoidance was shown. In conclusion, results indicated that successful restrained eaters showed a tendency to avoid palatable food cues while unsuccessful restrained eaters showed a tendency to approach to palatable food cues. On this basis, researchers should consider the distinction between successful and unsuccessful restrained eating when assessing attentional biases corresponding to restrained eating.

Counteractive Construal in Consumer Goal Pursuit

Counteractive evaluation: Asymmetric shifts in the implicit value of conflicting motivations

The Interplay of Regulatory Fit and Construal Level in Influencing Behavioral Intention

The Effect of Self-Control Goal on the Construal Level of Utilitarian Goods and Hedonic Goods

The Effect of Decision Strategy on Self-Control Choice

Hedonism or Self-Growth? the Influence of Perceived Control on Individual Product Preferences for Individuals under Self-Threat

Yielding to Temptation: Self‐Control Failure, Impulsive Purchasing, and Consumer Behavior

The Shifting Preference For Contingent Rewards In Goal Pursuit

Thinking Concretely or Abstractly: the Influence of Fit Between Goal Progress and Goal Construal on Subsequent Self-Regulation

Counteracting Obstacles with Optimistic Predictions.

The Impact of Construal Level on Behavioral Inhibition: Evidences from Behavioral and ERP Studies

Situational Strategies for Self-Control

When Compensatory Consumption Backfires: the Asymmetric Effect of Self-Threat on Consumption Preference and Satisfaction

The Willpower Paradox: Possible and Impossible Conceptions of Self-Control

Attentional Biases Toward Food-Related Information among Restrained Eaters Based on the Goal Conflict Model of Eating

Effect of Status Threat on Preference for Cross-Domain Self-Improvement Products: the Moderation of Trade-off Beliefs

How Do Individuals Cope Self-Threats with Consuming Behaviors? Analysis Based on the Orientation-Path Integration Model

The effect of material and experiential consumption on goal pursuit

Decision-making under Ethical Temptation: How Construal Level Theory May Help

The Self-Control Irony: Desire for Self-Control Limits Exertion of Self-Control in Demanding Settings

Time-Inconsistent Preferences and Strategic Self-Control in Digital Content Consumption.