Pharmacoeconomics Evaluation of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Yang Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5433.2010.04.010
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness/utility of pemetrexed plus cisplatin therapy versus cisplatin monotherapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma(MPM) in China clinical practice. Methods:The retrospective pharmacoeconomic analysis was developed based on the largest phase III trial(EMPHACIS) in patients with MPM. The efficacy came from the EMPHACIS. The costs including pharmacy costs, chemotherapy costs and drug-related adverse events were calculated according to Chinese prices. Besides the cost-effectiveness/utility analysis, the one-way sensitive analysis was developed using ceiling price and minimum price of pemetrexed. Results: The total pemetrexed plus cisplatin cost per patient varied between $56 421.63 and 58 049.93. Incremental cost per life-year gained ranged from $127 102 to 212 514.8,and incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year was $218 957.7~360 542.3. The price of pemetrexed had a great influence on results. Conclusion: Pemetrexed was unlikely to be considered cost-effective for all the patients. These findings were better for fully supplemented patients with good performance status and advanced diseases. In addition, domestic pemetrexed is more likely to be cost effective.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?