Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Surgeries for Early-stage Endometrial Carcinoma

Song Xiaochen,Li Meng,Xiong Guangwu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2011.05.009

2011-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopy for endometrial carcinoma in an early stage.Methods From August 2003 to October 2010,79 patients with early-stage endometrial carcinoma who underwent laparoscopic(LPS group,n=56) or laparotomic(LPT group,n=23) surgeries were retrospectively analyzed.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,number of resected pelvic lymph nodes,gastrointestinal recovery time,and postoperative complications,hospital stay,morbidity and recurrence rate were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results LPS group showed significantly less intraoperative blood loss,and shorter gastrointestinal recovery time and hospital stay [(157.1±111.2) ml vs.(221.7±169.8) ml,t=1.349,P=0.049;t=4.055,P=0.000;and t=2.310,P=0.028,respectively].No significant difference was found in the number of resected pelvic lymph nodes,postoperative complications and morbidity(P>0.05).The patients were followed up until February 2011.The mean follow-up in the LPS group(50 cases) was 28.7 months(ranged from 4 to 82 months),and that in the LPT group was 39.0 months(ranged from 17 to 64 months).In the LPS group,1 patient showed recurrence in 24 months,and 1 patient developed metastasis at the puncture site at month 31,but no patient died.In the LPT group,1 patient showed recurrence in 27 months,and 1 patient died at month 59.No significant difference was found in the recurrent rate between the two groups(P=0.493).Conclusions Compared with open surery,laparoscopic surgery has the advantages of less blood and quick recovery in the treatment of early-stage endometrial carcinoma.It may be another choice for endometrial carcinoma,but its clinical value needs to be confirmed by long-term research.