Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis between gastric mucinous cancer and gastric signet ring cell cancer

Zhi-jun YE,Jian-hui CHEN,Tian-bao WANG,Han-ping SHI,Shi-rong CAI,Yu-long HE,Wen-hua ZHAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-7402.2010.02.012
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinicopathological characteristics between mucinous gastric carcinoma(MGC) and gastric signet ring cell carcinoma(SRC),and analyze prognostic factors.Methods Clinical data of 1016 consecutive gastric cancer patients treated in our hospital from 1994 to 2006 were analyzed retrospectively,clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors were compared between MGC and SRC patients.Results Among the all gastric cancer patients,there were 68(6.8%) MGC and 92(9.1%) SRC patients.There were significant differences in the proportions of age group,invasion depth,distant metastasis,radical resection,and TNM stage(P<0.05),but not in male to female ratio,tumor size,tumor location,Borrmann types,lymph node metastasis,peritoneal seeding,hepatic metastasis between MGC and SRC patients.The overall cumulative 5-year survival rates of MGC and SRC patients were 29.4% and 37.3% respectively,but no significant difference was found(P>0.05).Stratification analysis revealed that the survival rates of MGC patients with lymph node metastasis,peritoneal seeding,and Borrmann Ⅲ type,were significantly higher than those of SRC patients.Multivariate analysis showed that liver metastasis,lymph node metastasis and curative resection were independent prognostic factors of MGC patients,while Borrmann types,TNM stage and curative resection were independent prognostic factors of SRC patients.Conclusions Compared with SRC patients,higher proportion of senile patients,distant metastasis,advanced TNM stages,and lower curative resection rate are characteristic in MGC patients.The prognosis of MGC patients is poorer than that of SRC patients,but no significant difference can be found,probably because that other important clinicopathological parameters comprehensively affect the prognosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?