Abstract:Judgments of the orientations of 2D lines show systematic biases that can be described as exaggerating deviations from horizontal. These biases are not due to numeric estimation biases. An orientation of about 37° from horizontal is judged to be equidistant from horizontal and vertical. The same orientation is judged to be 45° from horizontal and 45° from vertical. One hypothesis concerning this distortion is an experience-based anisotropy in the distribution of orientation sensitive cells in visual cortex. An alternative view is that these biases are intrinsic to the encoding of spatial orientation. To tease apart these two possibilities we oriented observers at 45° from vertical and asked them to do two kinds of tasks. One task was a psychometric measurement of perceived vertical or horizontal using a forced choice method. Judgments of visual stimuli, presented in a circular aperture that removed any external visual references, were made either with respect to an egocentric (bodily) or exocentric (gravitational) reference frame. Over 150 participants were tested. Both within and between subjects, variability was much less for judgments made with respect to the exocentric (perceived gravitational) reference frame. Similarly, when required to make numeric estimates of orientation with respect to the two types of reference frame, estimates with respect to perceived gravitational frames exhibited the standard bias exaggerating deviations from horizontal. Estimates with respect to bodily frames did not. These findings are consistent with the precedence of gravitational reference frames in visual experience and imply that 2D orientation asymmetries between horizontal and vertical are not caused simply by biases in the distribution of early cortical orientation analyzers. Precision was greatest when observers were upright so that gravitational and bodily vertical were aligned, but for tilted observers, judgments made with respect to gravitational reference frames were most similar to judgments made upright. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012

The Influence of Sensation and Report Methods on Slant Perception

A Review on Slant Perception and its Influencing Factors

Palm boards are not action measures: An alternative to the two-systems theory of geographical slant perception

Does Perceived Angular Declination Contribute to Perceived Optical Slant on Level Ground?

Perceived Aspect Ratio on Tilted Surfaces Supports the Hypothesis That Perceived Slant Approximates a Scaled Sine Function of Actual Slant

Can Spatial Biases Be Eliminated Through Learning?

Humans have precise knowledge of familiar geographical slants.

Design, Data, and Theory Regarding a Digital Hand Inclinometer: a Portable Device for Studying Slant Perception.

The Perception of 2D Orientation is Categorically Biased

Action and Motivation: Measuring Perception or Strategies?

Manual matching of perceived surface orientation is affected by arm posture: evidence of calibration between proprioception and visual experience in near space

Effects of symmetry, texture, and monocular viewing on geographical slant estimation

Two Distinct Angular Perceptual Variables Account for the Dissociation Between Egocentric and Exocentric Distance Perception

Expert Performance by Athletes in the Verbal Estimation of Spatial Extents Does Not Alter Their Perceptual Metric of Space

Perceptual Bias in 2D Orientation is Also Present in Obliquely-Viewed Planes

Exocentric Reference Frames Determine 2D Orientation Bias

Human Sensitivity to Slopes of Slanted Paths

A linear sensorimotor transformation accounts for response range-dependent biases in human heading estimation

The Effect Of Attention Orienting On Stereopsis

Diverse Effects of Gaze Direction on Heading Perception in Humans

Measuring the Local and Global Variabilities in Body Sway by Nonlinear Poincaré Technology