Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the efficacy and muscle injury imaging between oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS:The clinical data of 60 patients with single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent surgical treatment from January 2018 to October 2019 was retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into OLIF groups and TLIF group according to different surgical methods. The 30 patients in the OLIF group were treated with OLIF plus posterior intermuscular screw rod internal fixation. There were 13 males and 17 females, aged from 52 to 74 years old with an average of (62.6±8.3) years old. And 30 patients in the TLIF group were treated with TLIF via the left approach. There were 14 males and 16 females, aged from 50 to 81 years old with an average of (61.7±10.4) years old. General data including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and complications were recorded for both groups. Radiologic data including disc height (DH), the left psoas major muscle, multifidus muscle, longissimus muscle area, T2-weighted image hyperintensity changes and interbody fusion or nonfusion were observed. Laboratory parameters including creatine kinase (CK) values on postoperative 1st and 5th days were analyzed. Visual analogue scale(VAS) and Oswestry disability index(ODI) were used to assess clinical efficacy. RESULTS:There was no significant difference in the operative time between two groups(P>0.05). The OLIF group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume compared to the TLIF group(P<0.01). The OLIF group also had DH better recovery compared to the TLIF group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in left psoas major muscle area and the hyperintensity degree before and after the operation in the OLIF group (P>0.05). Postoperativly, the area of the left multifidus muscle and longissimus muscle, as well as the mean of the left multifidus muscle and longissimus muscle in the OLIF group, were lower than those in the TLIF group (P<0.05) .On the 1st day and the 5th day after operation, CK level in the OLIF group was lower than that in the TLIF group(P<0.05). On the 3rd day after operation, the VAS of low back pain and leg pain in the OLIF group were lower than those in the TLIF group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the ODI of postoperative 12 months, low back and leg pain VAS at 3, 6, 12 months between the two groups(P>0.05). In the OLIF group, 1 case of left lower extremity skin temperature increased after the operation, and the sympathetic chain was considered to be injured during the operation, and 2 cases of left thigh anterior numbness occurred, which was considered to be related to psoas major muscle stretch, resulting in a complication rate of 10% (3/30). In the TLIF group, one patient had limited ankle dorsiflexion, which was related to nerve root traction, two patients had cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and the dural sac was torn during the operation, and one patient had incision fat liquefaction, which was related to paraspinal muscle dissection injury, resulting in a complication rate of 13% (4/30). All patients achieved interbody fusion without cage collapse during the 6- month follow-up. CONCLUSION:Both OLIF and TLIF are effective in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. However, OLIF surgery has obviously advantages, including less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, and good recovery of intervertebral space height. From the changes in laboratory indexes of CK and the comparison of the left psoas major muscle, multifidus muscle, longissimus muscle area, and high signal intensity of T2 image on imaging, it can be seen that the degree of muscle damage and interference of OLIF surgery is lower than that of TLIF.

The Effect of Body Mass Index on the Outcome of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Complicated with Lumbar Instability

Short-term Effectiveness of Transforaminal Unilateral Approach for Bilateral Decompression in Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Comparative study of oblique lateral approach and posterior fusion in the treatment of grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ lumbar spondylolisthesis

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion for severe lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up

[EFFECT OF BODY MASS INDEX ON OUTCOME OF POSTERIOR 360 DEGREES FUSION FOR SINGLE-LEVEL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASES].

Comparison of Clinical Effect and Muscle Injury Imaging Between Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Trans-Foraminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Segment Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Comparative study of three surgical procedures of lumbar interbody fusion for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis

Application of Small Surgical Incision Bilateral Spinous Process in Posterior Single Segment Lumbar Interbody Fusion

The Indirect Decompression Effect of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis

[The Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Lumbar Instability].

[Clinical Value of Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Assisted by X-Tube System in the Treatment of Low Back Disorders].

Comparison of the clinical effects between bilateral vertebral facet joint fusion and interbody fusion cage implantation combined with pedicle internal fixation in the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability

The short term effect of posterior interbody fusion and internal fixation far treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis

Surgical decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis complicated by lumbar instability: Retrospective analysis of 181 cases

Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Single Level Lumbar Stenosis

Effects of lumbar interbody fusion combined pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis

[COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS AND CHANGE OF SAGITTAL SPINO-PELVIC PARAMETERS BETWEEN MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL AND CONVENTIONAL OPEN POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSIONS IN TREATMENT OF LOW-DEGREE ISTHMIC LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS]

Comparison of the Clinical Outcome in Overweight or Obese Patients after Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Long-term outcome and associated factors of lumbar decompression, internal fixation and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy Bilateral Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for One-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Modified Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis