Abstract:Destructive agents, who opt out of the game and indiscriminately harm others, paradoxically foster cooperation, representing an intriguing variant of the voluntary participation strategy. Yet, their impact on cooperation remains inadequately understood, particularly in the context of pairwise social dilemma games and in comparison to their counterparts, constructive agents, who opt out of the game but indiscriminately benefit others. Furthermore, little is known about the combined effects of both agent types on cooperation dynamics. Using replicator dynamics in infinite and well-mixed populations, we find that, contrary to their role in facilitating cooperation in multiplayer games, destructive agents fail to encourage cooperation in pairwise social dilemmas. Instead, they destabilize and may even replace defection in the prisoners' dilemma and stag-hunt games. Similarly, in the chicken game, they can destabilize or replace the mixed equilibrium of cooperation and defection, and they undermine cooperation in the harmony game. Conversely, constructive agents, when their payoffs exceed their contributions to opponents, can exhibit effects similar to destructive agents. However, if their payoffs are lower, while they destabilize defection in prisoners' dilemma and stag-hunt games, they do not disrupt the cooperation equilibrium in harmony games and have a negligible impact on the coexistence of cooperation in chicken games. The combination of destructive and constructive agents does not facilitate cooperation but instead generates complex evolutionary dynamics, including bi-stable, tri-stable, and quad-stable states, with outcomes contingent on their relative payoffs and game types. These results, taken together, enhance our understanding of the impact of the voluntary participation mechanism on cooperation, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of its influence.

Communicative Rationality and Dissolving of the Paradox of Backward Induction

Complex Dynamics and Control of A Dynamic R&D Bertrand Triopoly Game Model with Bounded Rational Rule

Rationalizing Irrational Beliefs

Communication in the Infinitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma: Theory and Experiments

Nash Equilibrium Seeking in Networked Games with Intermittent Communication

Communication, Renegotiation and Coordination with Private Values

Cooperative Equilibrium: A solution predicting cooperative play

Dynamic Competitive Persuasion

Overcommunication in strategic information transmission games

Cooperation Stimulation in Cooperative Communications: an Indirect Reciprocity Game

Inverse Game Theory for Stackelberg Games: the Blessing of Bounded Rationality

Communication Game and Changing of Epistemic Worlds

Translucent Players: Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Social Dilemmas

What Drives People's Choices in Turn-Taking Games, if not Game-Theoretic Rationality?

Game susceptibility, Correlation and Payoff capacity as a measure of Cooperative behavior in the thermodynamic limit of some Social dilemmas

Cooperation and Distributed Optimization for the Unreliable Wireless Game with Indirect Reciprocity.

Nash equilibrium mapping vs Hamiltonian dynamics vs Darwinian evolution for some social dilemma games in the thermodynamic limit

Impact of Keeping Silence on Spatial Reciprocity in Spatial Games.

Stability of pairwise social dilemma games: destructive agents, constructive agents, and their joint effects

Balancing rationality and social influence: Alpha-rational Nash equilibrium in games with herding

How much is convenient to defect? A method to estimate the cooperation probability in Prisoner's Dilemma and other games