Health Damage and Diabetes Screening Effectiveness Evaluation of Different Fasting Plasma Glucose Cut - Points

于洋,苏军英,徐爱强,马吉祥,孙晓筠,李维卡,贺桂顺
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6639.2008.08.001
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To perform evaluations on health impact and cost-effectiveness of diabetes mellitus(DM) screening for different fasting plasma glucose(FPG)cut-points and further determine the rationality of lowering the cut-point of impaired fasting glucose(IFG).Methods A sample of 16 341 rural residents was selected and investigated in Shandong province of China.All participants were physically examined on height,weight,waist circumference,blood pressure and FPG. Oral glucose tolerance test(OGTT)was performed for subjects with FPG valued from 5.6 to 7.0 mmol/L in two counties and 6.1 to 7.0 mmol/L in other six counties.Then the health effects at the different FPG cut-points were analyzed and the cost-effec- tiveness of impaired glucose tolerance(IGT)and DM screening with different cut-points of IFG were compared. Results Both the prevalence of obesity,central obesity,hypertension and the mean of anthropometric indexes increased with the increasing of FPG,especially FPG was 5.1 mmol/L and above.The prevalence of isolated IFG(I-IFG),impaired fasting glu- cose with impaired glucose tolerance(IFG/IGT)increased by 1.80 and 1,09 times,but the prevalence of DM increased by 6.34% only as the standards of ADA was adopted.The result of OGTT shows that the prevalence of IGT and DM in subjects with FPG valued from 5.6 to 6.1 mmol/L lowers half and one third than the subjects with FPG valued from 6.1 to 7.0 mmol/L.The cost-effectiveness of screening in former is a half and two third of that in the latter respectively.Conclusion Both cut-point of IFG developed by ADA and WHO are rational if we consider it from different aspects.Different cut-off point should be chosen according to the different purpose of study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?