Do S&P 500 Index Options Violate the Martingale Restriction?

N Strong,XZ Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9934(199908)19:5<499::aid-fut1>3.3.co;2-f
1999-01-01
Journal of Futures Markets
Abstract:The study tests Longstaff's martingale restriction on S&P 500 index options over the period 1990-1994, Assuming the S&P index follows a lognormal distribution results in systematic violations of the martingale restriction, the implied index value from options consistently overestimating the market value. Adopting a generalized distribution, allowing for nonnormal third and fourth moments, produces economically insignificant rejections of the martingale restriction. A simulation analysis supports the empirical results from the lognormal model in the presence of nonnormal skewness and kurtosis, Overall, the results support the conclusion that the no-arbitrage assumption coupled with the generalized distribution offers a good working model for S&P index options over the period studied. (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?