IVS14+1 G>A Genotype in the Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Gene: a Predictive Marker with Fluorouracil Pharmacokinetic in Reducing Adverse Reactions of Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Local Advanced and Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

蔡讯,方珏敏,薛鹏,宋卫峰,胡炯,顾鸿莉,杨海燕,王理伟
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3969.2013.02.009
2013-01-01
Abstract:Background and purpose:Serious adverse reactions may happen in the routine administration of fluorouracil (5-FU) due to individual differences, DPD is the rate-limiting enzyme in the catabolism of 5-FU, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in DPD gene is the main reason affecting the activity of DPD, while IVS14+1 G>A accounted for about 50% of the total mutation, reports such as IVS14+1 G>A forecasting 5-FU associated adverse reactions was rare, so we retrospectively investigated the relationship between IVS14+1 G>A genotype in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) gene and 5-FU associated adverse reactions in 80 patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, in order to confirm the role of DPD IVS14+1 G>A genotype in predicting and reducing adverse reactions of 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Methods:Eighty patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled. Single nucleotide polymorphisms for DPD gene were analyzed before chemotherapy by high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis, and the plasma concentration of 5-FU was detected by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) after continuous infusion of 5-FU over 12 h in each cycle. The factors related to plasma concentration of 5-FU were screened by stepwise regression. The relationship between DPD IVS14+1 genotype and adverse reactions was retrospectively analyzed in 56 patients whose plasma concentrations were greater than predicted lower limit. Results:Of the 56 patients whose plasma concentration were greater than 26.83 mg/L, the predicted lower limit, the incidence of bone marrow suppression, hand-foot syndrome and diarrhea for DPD IVS14+1 mutant patients were both higher than those DPD IVS14+1 wide type ones (P=0.04, P=0.03 and P=0.04), while there were no difference in median progression free survival (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) (mPFS:7.50±0.44 months vs 8.50±0.40 months, P=0.69;mOS:21.00±1.12 months vs 20.00±1.16 months, P=0.72). Conclusion:The patients with DPD IVS14+1 G>A mutation and higher 5-FU plasma concentration need to adjust 5-FU dosage in next chemotherapy:for patients with DPD heterozygous mutation, 5-FU dose should be appropriately reduced according to last plasma concentration to reduce adverse reactions, while the homozygous ones should avoid application of 5-FU and its derivatives.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?