Accounting Conservatism, Information Asymmetry and M&A Performance: Evidence from Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share Listed Companies
Wei-an LI,Gang CHEN
2015-01-01
Abstract:Accounting conservatism has recently become a hot topic,which is not just an accounting information characteristic,but an effective corporate governance mechanism.Based on the view that accounting conservatism can reduce information asymmetry between company managers and shareholders,and control the managersu0027 self-interested behavior,this paper studies the influence of accounting conservatism on the performance of the acquiring firms.Firstly,in the process of implementing MA,accounting conservatism is helpful to inhibit managers manipulate earnings upward.Because accounting conservatism requires that companies cannot overestimate the good cases,such as income,and undervalue cases,such as debt.Moreover,there is lower standard to confirm losses.Secondly,accounting conservatism can reflect bad information and confirm losses timely and fully,which is helpful to abandon the MA of negative NPV and stop the MA without profit.On the other hand,accounting conservatism is helpful to achieve more key resources from stakeholders,such as creditor.Because the corporate accounting is more conservatism,the stakeholders have higher sense of trust to the company operating conditions,then more willing to provide resources.This paper uses the MA events happened during 2007 to 2011,and finds that;there was no significant relationship between accounting conservatism and short-term acquisitions performance,but a significant positive correlation between accounting conservatism and long-term acquisitions performance.This paper further investigates accounting conservatism does play a role in reducing the information asymmetry,and finds that;in the acquiring firms of relatively poor governance mechanisms(that is the bigger of board scale;the lower of the ratio of independent directors;the more dispersed ownership;the higher of institution share),the positive impacts on the long-term MA performance are more obvious.These suggest that accounting conservatism does not have a significant positive effect on performance in a short period,but take some time to appear,and its positive influence extents are differences among firms with different company governance mechanisms.The findings above put forward to two theoretical implications.Firstly,the existing literatures mainly focus on the information characteristic of accounting conservatism,but pay less attention to the governance effect.This paper verifies that accounting conservatism is positive with long-term MA performance,which enriches the existing theoretical research.Secondly,the existence researches from the perspective of corporate governance level mainly focus on the influence of a certain kind of governance mechanism on MA performance,but pay less attention to two or more mechanism together.The paper verifies that there are different influences of accounting conservatism on MA performance among firms which have different governance mechanisms,which implies that it is necessary to treat multiple corporate governance mechanisms with systematic and synergistic thinking.The findings above also provide some beneficial practical implications.First,when make the MA decision in the listed companies,on the one hand,they should pay more attention to the accounting information quality,because the accounting are more conservatism,the long-term MA performance are better.On the other hand,when design corporate governance mechanisms which are helpful to achieve scientific decisions,they should consider multiple mechanisms together rather than a certain kind of mechanisms.Moreover,the firms should use long-term view to treat the usefulness of corporate governance mechanism.