Return to Abstract Theory of Right of Action

Yan Renqun

2011-01-01

Abstract:It has been insisted that right of action should have some conditions, but attaching one or more conditions to right of action would make it unworthy of its name, meaningless, and paradoxical. Those defects are severe and fatal. All the theories of conditional right of action should be abandoned, even if they regard right of action as a human right or argue it to be a constitutional right. At the beginning of litigation, court is in the state of ignorance. It must accept a case unconditionally and hear all the procedural and substantial issues in due process. For this reason, theory of abstract right of action, which does not annex any requirement to right of action, has inherent rationality. Most of criticism to it is unreasonable. It can strongly sustain remedy to right of action and truly highlight the defect of setting conditions for filing and accepting a case. Theory of right of demanding judicial action does not attach requirement to right of action either, but it is a revisionary abstract theory of right of action, which makes up the defect of the theory of abstract right of action and has more practical significance. By the two kinds of abstract theory, we can clarify the relationship between right of action and condition of making substantial judgment, right to judicial verdict. The right of action contains only two kinds of right, i. e. , unconditional right to bring an action, and right of demanding impartial judicial trial. We should wipe off the heavy burden on right of action exerted by theories of conditional right of action and return to abstract theory of right of action.