Statue of Sequential Decision-making with Time Pressure:Review with an Extentional TAM Framework
王渊,白永秀
2013-01-01
Abstract:Many real world decision-making problems are sequential in nature. A series of choices is made available over time,and it is often efficient(and sometimes even necessary) to make a selection without waiting to be presented with all of the alternatives. So two strategies wait to see and me too,may not be available. On mate choice task,for example,people choose their mate at one of a sequence of alternatives,without knowing the next alternatives is better or worse. This type of sequential decision has a continuous utility function. People aim to choose the best mate,but no way to measure their selection. There are many similar problems,including online DM,emergency DM,job search,stock operation,and so on. This decision-making scenario has the same essential features as a recreational mathematics problem known as the ‘sequential decision making'or ‘secretary problem'( see Ferguson 1989 for a historical overview). In sequential DM problems,an observer is presented with a sequence of possible choices,and must decide whether to accept or reject each possibility in turn. The number of choices in the complete sequence is fixed and known,and only the rank of each possibility,relative to those already seen,is presented to the observer. If the observer chooses the best possibility in the sequence,their decision is correct,and any other choice is regarded as incorrect.Such sequential decision problem has been know by many different names in the literature,but the most common name is the secretary problem,which appeared first in Scientific American and described by six assumptions. Much studies investigated the optimal strategies of each assumption were relaxed. In recently,some studies indicated that decision maker may not relay on the optimal strategy to make decision,otherwise intuitive decision,under time pressure. Thus,some systematic and predictable biases accompanied with their search behavior. These biases can be avoided as long as identification,so some research aim to identify the bias caused by endogenous time pressure of sequential problem. First of all,we should reveal effect of time pressure on decision making. There are some research found that a speed-accuracy tradeoff can occur with time constraints,and that individuals utilize many noncompensatory coping strategies,including acceleration and filtration of information. But there exist some problem inclusive,such as what happens,too late or too early,when decision maker stop searching information under time pressure? There are two Hypotheses about decision maker's search behavior. For one issue,according to intertemporal choice theory,human behavior is impatient,prefer the earlier results obtained,so they may under search and choose too early(Dong,2008). For another issue,according to Loewenstein Perlec(1993),decision maker preferences increasing sequence,so they may over search and choose too late. This paper proposed that there are some gaps between established papers. May be the reason is none of an integrated framework,each study survey the influence of time pressure in appointed problem and the mechanization is not clear. This paper proposed an integrated framework,psychology-behavior-result,based on TAM(Technology Acceptance Mode),which is the most popular framework in IS. We extract the causal logic of TAM and proposed a system framework to analysis the influence mechanization and then reviews the literatures. Considering not only time pressure on psychology,behavior and results of individual impact,and considering the internal logic between the three issues. The aim of this study may answer two questions. First,why there are some inconsistent impact on DM's search behavior in time pressure? Second,how do we regulate this contradiction? At last,some future areas of research bring this paper into a close. Firstly,some differences exist in search bias according to different theory hypothesizes,we should empirical study and give a reasonable expiation. Secondly,explain the mechanic of time pressure on decision results is very important to improve quality of decisionmaking. Thirdly,laboratory experiment is feasible method for revealing the impact of time pressure on sequential DM.