A Comparative Study on Different Schemes of Automatic River System Extraction Based on DEM and Vector Channels

ZHENG Ziyan,ZHANG Wanchang
2009-01-01
Abstract:Distributed hydrologic stimulations usually integrate hydrologic models with Geographic Information System(GIS).The foundation of the simulations lies on how to obtain hydrologic and topographic parameters from Digital Elevation Model(DEM).Automatic extraction of river channel systems from DEM is a fundamental procedure for distributed hydrological simulations.Numerous algorithms for watershed automatic delineation based on DEM have been developed.However,Due to the errors involved in DEM,associated complex procedures in watershed delineation,and other natural and human factors determining realistic river channel systems,discrepancies usually occur between extracted river channel systems merely based on DEM and realistic channels.Additional information should be considered in traditional extraction processes in order to ensure highly reliable delineations.In this study,we explored performances of different automatic river network extraction schemes based on DEM and the information imposed in the processes.We introduced a real river channel vector map to automatic extraction based on DEM for difference schemes.Two different methods to impose the real channel vector map on DEM,namely modifying an elevation matrix or a flow direction matrix,were utilized in automatic extraction procedures.A large,complicated catchment with an area of over 10000 km2 gauged by the Linyi hydrologic station in Shandong province was selected to perform the comparisons.Results showed that imposing real channel digitized vectors on DEM greatly improved the precision of extracted river networks.In addition,we evaluated the effects of different imposition schemes on delineation results and discussed their advantages and shortcomings,respectively.These schemes included:directly decreasing the elevation of pits and combined with ESRI-ArcGIS's hydrologic toolbox,the "AGREE" algorithm provided by the HEC-GeoHMS model,the AV-SWAT model's "Burn-In" scheme and two different schemes provided by the TauDEM model.The ESRI-ArcGIS's hydrologic toolbox and the HEC-GeoHMS use a single flow direction algorithm(SFD) while the AV-SWAT model and the TauDEM model use a multiple flow direction algorithm(MFD),showing the latter offering better results because man-made downstream channels diverge again and the SFD cannot identify it.It was suggested that in general,the algorithms provided by the TauDEM model performed best.Some discussions on automatic delineations of lakes and reservoirs in large watersheds were also given.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?