The Effects of Combined Versus Selective Adrenergic Blockade on Left Ventricular and Systemic Hemodynamics, Myocardial Substrate Preference, and Regional Perfusion in Conscious Dogs with Dilated Cardiomyopathy

LA Nikolaidis,I Poornima,P Parikh,M Magovern,YT Shen,RP Shannon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.082
IF: 24
2006-01-01
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Abstract:OBJECTIVES Given that adverse effects of chronic sympathetic activation are mediated by all three adrenergic receptor subtypes (beta(1), beta(2), alpha(1)), we examined the effects of standard doses of carvedilol and metoprolol succinate (metoprolol controlled release/extended release [CR/XL)) on hemodynamics, myocardial metabolism, and regional organ perfusion.BACKGROUND Both beta(1) selective and combined adrenergic blockade reduce morbidity and mortality in heart failure. Whether there arc advantages of one class over the other remains controversial, even in the wake of the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET). Similarly, the mechanistic basis for the relative differences is incompletely understood.METHODS Thirty-three conscious, chronically instrumented dogs with pacing-induced (240 min(-1) for 4 weeks) dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) were randomized to carvedilol (25 mg twice daily, Coreg, Glaxo Smith Kline, Research Triangle, North Carolina) or nictoprolol succinate (100 mg qd, Toprol XL, Astra Zeneca, Wilmington, Delaware). Left ventricular and systemic hemodynamics, myocardial substrate uptake, and norepinephrine spillover were measured before and after three days of treatment. Regional (renal, hepatic, skeletal muscle) blood flows were measured using neutron-activated microspheres.RESULTS Both agents had comparable heart rate effects. However, carvedilol-treated dogs showed significantly greater increases in stroke volume and cardiac output and decreases in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and systemic vascular resistance. Carvedilol increased renal, hepatic, and skeletal muscle blood flow. Carvedilol increased myocardial glucose uptake and suppressed norepinephrine and glucagon. Carvedilol antagonized the response to exogenous norepinephrine to a greater extent than metoprolol CR/XL.CONCLUSIONS At doses inducing comparable heart rate reductions, short-term treatment with carvedilol had superior hemodynamic and metabolic effects compared with metoprolol CR/XL. These data Suggest important advantages of blocking all three adrenergic receptor subtypes in DCM.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?