Electronic Structure of Cycloheptatrienyl Sandwich Compounds of Actinides:  An(η<sup>7</sup>-C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>7</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(An = Th, Pa, U, Np, Pu, Am)

Jun Li,Bruce E. Bursten
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ja971149m
IF: 15
1997-01-01
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Abstract:The cycloheptatrienyl actinide sandwich compounds An(eta(7)-C7H7)(2)(q) (An = Th-Am; q = 2-, 1-, 0, 1+) have been studied by using local and gradient-corrected density functional methods, with the inclusion of scalar (mass-velocity and Darwin) relativistic effects; It has been found that the staggered conformer of U(eta(7)-C7H7)(2)(-) is more stable than the eclipsed one by about 0.6 kcal/mol. The f delta orbitals not only participate in the bonding with the e(2) " p pi orbitals of the C7H7 rings, but are as important as the d delta orbitals in stabilizing the frontier pn orbitals of the C7H7 rings. With increasing atomic number of the actinide, the 5f manifold and ligand based frontier e(2) " MOs become considerably closer in energy. As a result, the actinide 5f percentage in the frontier e(2) " MOs increases markedly, while the contribution by the 6d orbitals gradually decreases. The ground electron configurations, ionization energies, electron affinities, and An-C7H7 bond energies are-strongly affected by these effects. The bonding-analysis indicates that U(eta(7)-C7H7)(2)(-) and U(eta(7)-C7H7)(2) are best considered as complexes of U(III) and U(IV), respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?