Analysis of Heart Rate Variability During Asymptomatic Periods in Children with Vasovagal Syncope

TIAN Hong,FU Ming-yu,TAO Ling,HAN Lu,XU Su-mei,LIU Yu-yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-515x.2012.21.019
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze heart rate variability during asymptomatic periods in children with vasovagal syncope(VVS). Me-thods Forty-five children diagnosed as VVS in clinic were recruited as a study group,38 with positive and 7 with negative response to head-up tilt test(HUTT).Twenty healthy children were matched as healthy controls.Twenty-four hours holter monitoring was performed and time and frequency domain indices were studied. Results 1.Compared with the healthy controls,the values of time-domain SDNN(121.82±33.0 vs 152.95±31.66,P0.01) and SDANN(114.42±33.41 vs 134.7±27.43,P0.05) were lower,and the ratio of low frequency / high frequency(LF/ HF)(1.67±0.54 vs 1.25±0.2,P0.01) were higher in study group.2.There was no significant difference in the time-domain and frequency-domain indices(P0.05) in HUTT positive and negative children.3.Compared with cardioinhibitory response(CI) children,SDNN(100.61±23.02 vs 150.5±29.46,P0.01),SDANN(96.78±28.77 vs 141.25±29.06,P0.05),rMSSD(29.22±19.56 vs 53.75±23.08,P0.05) and PNN50(11.29±9.31 vs 23.96±12.54,P0.05) were significantly lower,LF(39.61±8.45 vs 19.68±4.17,P0.01) and LF/HF(2.12±0.55 vs 1.09±0.11,P0.01) were significantly higher in vasodepressor response(VD) children.And compared with mixed responses(MX)children,rMSSD(29.22±19.56 vs 52.57±18.54,P0.05) and PNN50(11.29±9.31 vs 22.96±11.13,P0.05) were lower significantly,LF(39.61±8.45 vs 29.72±9.87,P0.05) and LF/HF(2.12±0.55 vs 1.38±0.30,P0.01) were higher significantly in VD children,but there was no difference between CI and MX children(P0.05).4.Compared with the healthy controls,rMSSD and PNN50 obviously declined in VD group while LF significantly increased(P0.05). Conclusions There is a different alteration in autonomic activity in VVS children during asymptomatic periods.The changes in baseline of RMSSD,PNN50 and LF parameters may serve as a predictor to identify VD clinically.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?