Abstract:In the early years of the New Period, along with the constant improvement of the social and political environment, the contestations among the exponents in the academic circles became lively; the viewpoint that (″literature) is a special ideology″ was also hotly debated. In the beginning of 1988, Luan Changda and Dong Xuewen began to query about the essentiality of ideology, and brought a severe concussion to the concept of essentiality of literary ideology which was considered as the standard till that time, that triggered the contestation concerning the relationship between ideology and literature among the academic circles, which lasted for several years. The question whether the literature's true nature consists in ideology became the core proposition of the contestation. The essentiality of ideology recovered its predominant position in the contestation, and the scholars had sufficient and fruitful discussions on the definition of the basic concept of the ideology, the relationship between the literature and ideology, the dialectical relationship between the essentiality of literary ideology and the non-literary ideology, and the aesthetical ideology of literature etc. The fundamental premise of the deep probing into in the literary ideology is to understand correctly the original idea of the classic writers of Marxism and to clarify the ideology and its related concepts. As Lu Meilin said that too narrow or too broad interpretation of the connotation of the ideology is one of the main reasons that caused the disorder in the field of literature theories, and he pointed out that ideology is a concept about the whole organism of composing factors. Many scholars, such as Zhang Shouying, Bian Pingshu, and Li Sixiao, are interested in the composing factors of ideology. While they focused on the analysis of the concept of ideology, scholars like Feng Yi and Huang Lizhi adhered to the essentiality of ideology and launched the in-depth discussion on the relationship between the main role of literature and the nature of ideology. In the 1980s, scholars including Qian Zhongwen, Tong Qingbing and Wang Yuanxiang, deliberated on the aesthetical ideology and the aesthetical theory of reflection. In the field of the aesthetical ideology, they made a systematic and in-depth investigation on the nature of literature, successfully resolved the conflict between the literary ideology and the aesthetical consciousness, and opened a new window for us to understand the correlative contradictions between the form and the contents, the emotion and the reason, expression and representation, humanity and the class nature. Although there is a limitation in its failure to explain efficiently how to achieve the harmony between aesthetical consciousness and the ideological factors of literature, the aesthetical ideology transcended the bondage of pure epistemology, and fitted a dialectical link between the literary ideology and the aesthetical factors, and in this way enriched and developed the Marxist viewpoint on the nature of literature. In conclusion, when we affirm that the innate nature of literature consists in the ideology, we must know that literature also contains some non-ideological factors, and in order to prevent the tendency of simplicity and philistinism in the field of literary studies and to cognize the scientific literary phenomena, it is very important to penetrate into these non-ideological factors.

Method of "Literary Perspective" and Recognition of "American Spirit"

Literary Studies:Academic Ecology and Calling Spirit

The International Perspective and Cultural Interpretation in American Diplomatic History Studies in the Context of Globalization

Understanding American Historical Change through Cultural Traditions, Physical Environment, & Literature: A Comparative Reflection in Global Community

American National Spirit and Its Significances

American literature in Chinese perspectives

The Spirit of Self-reflection of Ancient Western Historiography

Seeking the "Original Meaning"of Thoughts of Existence——Literary Spirit and Artistic Interpretation of Chinese and Western Original Classic

Perspective on the Study of Essentiality of Literary Ideology

A Study of Modern Factors and Values in Traditional Historical Theories from the Perspective of "Is-Ought"

The"Objectivity Activity"Logic of Human Essence in the Perspective of Relativism and the World Significance of the"Chinese Road"

From the Standpoint to the Method: The Puzzle and Outlet of the Research on the Relationship Between Literature and Politics

Searching the Gap of History——Rethinking the “Free Discussion on Humanistic Spirit"

The Othevness in Myself——Methodological Problems of Anthropological Writing

What's "the Spirit of Historical Materialism"

A Narrative Paradigm for the History of Modern Chinese Literature

Historical Reglection on Ancient Literary Theory and Contemporary Construction of the Poetic Space——and On the Creative Logic of the Poetic Spfitce of the Ancient Literary Theory

The Dilemmas and Main Issues in the Research of the Historical Documents of Contemporary Chinese Literature

"Contemporary Literature":Its Structure and Basis of Legality

The Humanist Tradition of Comparative Literature

Another Textual Research on the Political Culture of the Origin of New Literature