Optimal baseflow separation scheme considering both high precision and low cost - take major watersheds in the United States as an example
Rong Zhong,Bo Li,Xue Zhang,Huixin Dang,Zeduan Zheng,Ziying Wang,Yixuan Guo,Yifan Bai,Hang Lyu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128133
IF: 6.4
2022-09-01
Journal of Hydrology
Abstract:Accurate baseflow separation is crucial for hydrological model calibration, water resources utilization and ecological water demand calculation. However, the two most commonly used baseflow separation methods, i.e., the tracer-based and the non-tracer-based separation methods, suffer from difficulty in obtaining data information, high cost and lack of physical basis, relatively large errors, respectively. To overcome the disadvantages of these two methods, this study evaluated the feasibility of calibrating the parameters of ECK and BRM methods using conductivity mass balance (CMB) separation results and determined the optimal parameter calibration scheme by analyzing the data of more than 200 monitoring points in the Colorado River Basin and the Mississippi River Basin. The results show that (1) The accuracy of ECK and BRM methods results can be significantly improved by 40–75% and 60–85% compared with the empirical method after the parameters have been calibrated. (2) CMBS is the optimal and the most accurate parameter calibration scheme for the BRM method because it considers the intra-annual dynamic characteristics of the baseflow. (3) To minimize costs and meet the accuracy requirements of parameter calibration, conductivity monitoring should be conducted for no less than 6 months and cover low-flow seasons in the areas lacking conductivity data. The proposed calibration scheme and the minimum monitoring period determined in this study can effectively improve the calculation accuracy and reduce the cost of baseflow separation.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,water resources,engineering, civil