Abstract:Purpose - Empty container repositioning is an important issue in the liner shipping industry. Generally stated, two groups of mathematical models have been proposed to tackle this issue. The first group aims to derive time-dependent origin-destination matrices that specify the number of empty containers to be repositioned at a decision epoch; the second group aims to develop effective state-feedback control policies consisting of dynamic decision-making rules. There is, however, a lack of research into the comparison of these two groups, especially with regard to realistic cases subject to uncertainties. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and compare the performances of some typical repositioning policies from these two groups and to shed light on their relative merits and suitability in various realistic scenarios.Design/methodology/approach - Based on a literature review, the paper classifies the current empty container repositioning policies into two categories: origin-destination (OD) based solutions and state-based dynamic rules. Typical policies are selected from these two categories and then evaluated using a simulation tool. A range of scenarios are designed based on realistic cases considering the stochastic and dynamic nature of liner services. A comprehensive set of simulation experiments are conducted and analysed; and the relative merits and suitability of the repositioning policies are identified.Findings - Through a carefully designed comparative study, several research findings are obtained with regard to how the performances of different types of empty container repositioning policies are affected by various factors such as structure of service route, uncertainty of daily demands, and parametric optimisation methods.Originality/value - The study makes a good attempt to analyse the suitability of different empty container repositioning policies in different scenarios. This is an area that has lacked investigation. The research findings can help shipping companies and other relevant stakeholders better understand the relative merits of different empty container repositioning policies and better tackle the challenges in operating the container shipping system.

Container Fleet Sizing and Empty Repositioning in Liner Shipping Systems

Joint Planning of Fleet Deployment, Speed Optimization, and Cargo Allocation for Liner Shipping

Liner Ship Fleet Deployment with Uncertain Demand

Empty Container Management in Cyclic Shipping Routes

Cargo Routing and Empty Container Repositioning in Multiple Shipping Service Routes

Tactical vessel deployment and empty container repositioning considering container turnover times

Assessment Of Empty Container Repositioning Policies In Maritime Transport

Lease Term Optimisation in Container Shipping Systems

Cost Optimization of Empty Shipping Container Allocation Based on Integer Programming

Flow Balancing-Based Empty Container Repositioning in Typical Shipping Service Routes

Integrated Optimization of Port Rotation Direction and Fleet Deployment for Container Liner Shipping Routes

Quantifying the Impact of Inland Transport Times on Container Fleet Sizing in Liner Shipping Services with Uncertainties

Scheduling Decision Model Of Liner Shipping Considering Emission Control Areas Regulations

A Joint Optimization Model for Liner Container Cargo Assignment Problem Using State-Augmented Shipping Network Framework

Liner shipping hub location and empty container repositioning: Use of foldable containers and container leasing

Effectiveness of an empty container repositioning policy with flexible destination ports

Modeling and Optimization of the Inland Container Transportation Problem Considering Multi-Size Containers, Fuel Consumption, and Carbon Emissions

Multi-objective optimization model and ant colony optimization of liner ship scheduling

Ship Type Decision Considering Empty Container Repositioning and Foldable Containers

Deploying, Scheduling, and Sequencing Heterogeneous Vessels in a Liner Container Shipping Route

Design And Freight Corridor-Fleet Size Choice In Collaborative Intermodal Transportation Network Considering Economies Of Scale