Abstract:Abstract Background Risk-scoring tools for perioperative mortality adjustment are essential for inter-hospital quality comparisons, which are still lacking in China. Existing scores had significant disadvantages when applied in managerial practice. Objective This study aimed to develop a simple risk score using highly accessible information that could appropriately adjust the perioperative mortality from major surgeries across tertiary Chinese public hospitals and provide a reference for other underdeveloped countries with the same need. Methods A study cohort from 19 hospitals was randomly split into a development set and an internal validation set in the ratio of 7:3. Another cohort from six hospitals was used as an external validation set. All data were obtained from the military-hospital public services database of the National Engineering Laboratory of Application Technology in Medical Big Data. Patients aged above 18 years undergoing one of the five categories of major surgical procedures between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020 were identified. The multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to predict the risk of mortality and derive the risk score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test were used to assess the discrimination and calibration of the model, respectively. Results The study set included 45 558 cases, divided into a development set containing 31 891 cases and an internal validation set with 13 667 cases. Another cohort with 14 956 cases was used as an external validation set. The final included predictor variables were age, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, condition at admission, admission route and the procedure. The predicted risk score ranged from −21.5 to 37.0 points. The model discriminated well in the development set, internal validation set, and external validation set. The AUC for them were 0.753 (Standard Error(SE) 0.016, 95% Confidence Interval(CI): 0.721,0.784), 0.790 (SE 0.025, 95% CI: 0.742,0.839), and 0.766(SE 0.019, 95% CI: 0.728, 0.804), respectively. P values in the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test were all above 0.05, indicating a good calibration. Conclusions This risk-scoring model was proved to have satisfactory performance, allowing the rapid and effective risk adjustment of perioperative mortality when comparing the surgical quality in tertiary hospitals in China and other underdeveloped regions.

Cardiac Anesthesia Risk Evaluation Score and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation for Chinese patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting:a comparison of risk prediction capability

[Study on the Efficiency of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (euroscore) in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of the Patients with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention].

Analysis in Early Clinical Outcome of High-operative-risk Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

[The Role of European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation in the Prediction of Quality of Life in Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery].

[Role of EuroSCORE and SinoSCORE in prediction of early postoperative quality of life in patients after coronary artery bypass surgery].

Validation of EuroSCORE II in Chinese Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

Validation of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (euroscore) in Chinese Heart Valve Surgery Patients

[The Predictive Values of EuroSCORE of Early Mortality in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients].

Preliminary Experience in Application of European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (Euroscore)

Does standard EuroSCORE predict the length of mechanical ventilation after coronary artery bypass graft in Chinese population?

Comparision of the Short-Term Clinical Outcomes of On-Pump and Off-Pump CABG in High-Euroscore Patients

Predictive Performances of ACEF, ACEF II, Updated ACEF II, and EuroSCORE II Risk Scores in Patients Undergoing Isolated Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

[Predictive Value of 3 Different Risk Stratification Models for Patients after Congenital Heart Surgeries].

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients

Validation of Cleveland Clinical Score Predicting Acute Renal Failure after Cardiac Surgery in Chinese Adult Patients

Performance of the Risk Scores for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Chinese Cohort

Development and Validation of Predictive Model—HASBLAD Score—For Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events During Perioperative Period of Non-cardiac Surgery: A Single Center Experience in China

The application of global registry of acute coronary events score and modified early warning score in patients with acute cardiogenic chest pain

Assessment of EuroSCORE II and STS Score Performance and the Impact of Surgical Urgency in Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery at a Referral Center in São Paulo, Brazil

Study on establishing risk index scoring for predicting perioperative mortality risk in aged patients undergoing non-neurologic and non-cardiovascular surgery

A novel risk score for in-hospital perioperative mortality of five major surgeries