Abstract:Abstract In this paper, we examine two types of interacting holographic dark energy model using Pantheon supernova data, BAO BOSS DR12, CMB Planck 2015, fgas (gas mass fraction) and SZ/Xray (Sunyaev–Zeldovich effect and X-ray emission) data from galaxy clusters (GC). In particular, we considered the Holographic Ricci dark energy and Extended holographic Ricci dark energy models. During this analysis, we considered seven types of phenomenological interaction terms (three linear and four non-linear) $$Q_1=3Hb\left( \rho _{D}+\rho _m\right) $$ Q1=3HbρD+ρm , $$Q_2=3Hb\rho _{D}$$ Q2=3HbρD , $$Q_3=3Hb\rho _{m}$$ Q3=3Hbρm , $$Q_4=3Hb\left( \rho _{D}+\frac{\rho _{D}^2}{\rho _{D}+\rho _m}\right) $$ Q4=3HbρD+ρD2ρD+ρm , $$Q_5=3Hb\left( \rho _{m}+\frac{\rho _{m}^2}{\rho _{D}+\rho _m}\right) $$ Q5=3Hbρm+ρm2ρD+ρm , $$Q_6=3Hb\left( \rho _{D}+\rho _{m}+\frac{\rho _{D}^2}{\rho _{D}+\rho _m}\right) $$ Q6=3HbρD+ρm+ρD2ρD+ρm , $$Q_7=3Hb\Big (\rho _{D}+\rho _{m}+\frac{\rho _{m}^2}{\rho _{D}+\rho _m}\Big )$$ Q7=3Hb(ρD+ρm+ρm2ρD+ρm) respectively. To find the best model we apply Bayesian Inference (BI) and use the $$\Lambda $$ Λ CDM as the referring model for comparison. Using the Bayesian Evidence model selection method we note that the $$Q_3$$ Q3 and $$Q_5$$ Q5 interaction terms are favored by observational data among the other ones. The obtained results also demonstrated that the evidence from the Bayesian inference method against the considered types of holographic Ricci dark energy model is strong since the $$\Lambda $$ Λ CDM is considered as the reference model and also the $$\Lambda $$ Λ CDM is preferred over the models. We also observed that the values of the deceleration parameter and the transition redshift for all models are compatible with the latest observational data and Planck 2015. In addition, we studied the jerk parameter for all models. Using our modified CAMB code, we observed that the interacting models suppress the CMB spectrum at low multipoles and enhances the acoustic peaks.

Interacting dark energy, holographic principle, and coincidence problem

THE "COINCIDENCE" PROBLEM IN MODIFIED HOLOGRAPHIC DARK ENERGY MODEL

Some Issues Concerning Holographic Dark Energy

INTERACTING GENERALIZED CHAPLYGIN GAS MODEL WITH HOLOGRAPHIC DARK ENERGY

Holographic Ricci Dark Energy: Interacting Model and Cosmological Constraints

USING A PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODEL TO TEST THE COINCIDENCE PROBLEM OF DARK ENERGY

A More General Interacting Model of Holographic Dark Energy

Constraining Interacting Dark Energy with Observational $h(z)$ Data

Reexploration of interacting holographic dark energy model: Cases of interaction term excluding the Hubble parameter

Testing the Interacting Dark Energy Model with Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy and Observational Hubble Data.

Probing Interaction and Spatial Curvature in the Holographic Dark Energy Model

Interactions in Dark Energy Models

Revisit of the interaction between holographic dark energy and dark matter

Scrutinizing Various Phenomenological Interactions in the Context of Holographic Ricci Dark Energy Models

Revisit of the Interacting Holographic Dark Energy Model after Planck 2015

A Quantitative Criteria for the Coincidence Problem

Interacting Scenarios with Dynamical Dark Energy: Observational Constraints and Alleviation of the H_0 Tension

Cosmological Constraints on Interacting Dark Energy with Redshift-Space Distortion after Planck Data

Interaction Between Dark Energy and Dark Matter: Observational Constraints from Ohd, Bao, Cmb and Sne Ia

Can interacting dark energy with dynamical coupling resolve the Hubble tension

Investigate the Interaction Between Dark Matter and Dark Energy