Dimerization of a Fluorocarbyne Complex to a Tetrahedrane Derivative: Fluorocarbyne and Difluoroacetylene Cobalt Carbonyl Complexes

Xiaoli Gong,Xiuhui Zhang,Qian-shu Li,Yaoming Xie,R. Bruce King,Henry F. Schaefer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/b924689d
IF: 4
2010-01-01
Dalton Transactions
Abstract:Recent work has resulted in the discovery of the fluorocarbyne complex (eta(5)-C5H5)Mo(CO)(2)(CF), in which the CF ligand behaves as a formal three- electron donor like the isoelectronic well-known NO ligand. In this connection the related fluorocarbyne cobalt carbonyls Co(CF)(CO)(n) (n = 3, 2, 1) and Co-2(CF)(2)(CO)(n) (n = 6, 5, 4, 3, 2) have been studied by density functional theory. The lowest energy structures for the mononuclear Co(CF)(CO)(n) derivatives parallel those of the isoelectronic Co(NO)(CO)(n) and Ni(CO)(n+1) derivatives. The mononuclear fluorocarbyne complex Co(CF)(CO)(3) is predicted to be thermodynamically unstable with respect to dimerization to the difluoroacetylene complex (FCCF)Co-2(CO)(6) by similar to 46 kcal mol(-1.) The binuclear Co-2(CF)(2)(CO)(n) structures can broadly be divided into two classes: (1) Structures in which the two CF ligands are coupled to form a Co2C2 tetrahedrane derivative containing an FCCF ligand derived from difluoroacetylene; (2) Structures maintaining separate CF ligands. With important exceptions, the structures of the difluoroacetylene complexes (FCCF)Co-2(CO)(n) (n = 6, 5, 4) parallel for the most part the structures predicted for the corresponding unsubstituted acetylene complexes. The relative energies of the Co-2(CF)(2)(CO)(n) structures with separate CF ligands indicate that the CF ligand is a more favorable bridging ligand than the ubiquitous CO ligand.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?