One-Week Antibiotics versus Maintenance Acid Suppression Therapy for Helicobacter pylori-Associated Peptic Ulcer Bleeding

Joseph J. Y. Sung,W. K. Leung,Roamy Suen,Vincent K.S. Leung,Francis K. L. Chan,Thomas K. W. Ling,James Y. W. Lau,Y. T. Lee,Enders K. W. Ng,Augustine F.B. Cheng,S. C. Sydney Chung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018816729449
1997-01-01
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Abstract:Bleeding peptic ulcer is the most importantcause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Our aim was tocompare the effect of anti-Helicobacter therapy withmaintenance treatment of H 2 -receptorantagonist in the prevention of relapses of ulcer andbleeding. Patients with bleeding duodenal or gastriculcers and H. pylori infection were randomized toreceive either a one-week course of triple therapy with bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole, andtetracycline plus ranitidine or a six-week course ofranitidine 300 mg/day. After the ulcers healed, theantibiotic-treated patients were not given anymedication, whereas the ranitidine-treated patientscontinued to receive a maintenance dose of 150 mg/day.One hundred twenty-six patients were randomized toreceive anti- Helicobacter therapy and 124 patients toreceive long-term ranitidine. H. pylori eradication wasachieved in 98.2% in those who received triple therapyand 6.1% in those who received ranitidine (P <0.0001). At the six-week follow-up, ulcer healing was documented in 88.2% in those who receivedtriple therapy and 86.1% in those who receivedranitidine (P = 0.639). Recurrent ulcer developed innine of the ranitidine-treated patients and three ofthem presented with recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding.One patient in the antibiotic group developed recurrentulcer without rebleeding (P = 0.01). It is concludedthat eradication of H. pylori is sufficient for the prevention of recurrent bleedingulcers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?