Carbonaceous Species Composition and Source Apportionment of PM_(2.5) in Urban Atmosphere of Wuhan

成海容,王祖武,冯家良,陈宏玲,张帆,刘佳
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2012.09.011
2012-01-01
Abstract:Fine particles(PM2.5) and carbonaceous aerosol(OC,EC) are important pollutants due to their adverse effects on visibility,climate change,and human health.To identify the regional pollution condition and develop effective control strategies s to manage and maintain the urban air quality,it is important to study the characteristics of fine particles and carbonaceous aerosol and the relative contributions of typical emission sources to fine particles and carbonaceous aerosol.Wuhan city is a highly industrialized city in Central China.24 hrs air samples were collected consecutively by a Hi-Volume PM2.5 air sampler every three days from July 2011 to February 2012,to determine the carbonaceous species compositions and potential sources of PM2.5 in urban atmosphere of Wuhan.The average concentrations of PM2.5,OC and EC in the urban air were(127.1±48.7),(19.4±10.5) and(2.9±1.48) μg·m-3,respectively.The concentration of PM2.5 was relatively higher compared to other major cities in China,while the OC and EC concentrations were lower.However,the concentrations of PM2.5,OC and EC were much higher than reported values of cities in other countries in the world.The PM2.5 concentrations showed the highest in autumn,followed by winter and spring due to the combined effects of meteorological factors and source emissions.A significant correlations(r2=0.69) between OC and EC was found in the PM2.5 of the urban air,indicating potential similar OC and EC sources.The average ratio of OC/EC was 6.7,suggesting that the main sources of OC and EC were vehicle emission and biomass burning.Average level of secondary organic aerosol(SOA) was 12.5 μg·m-3,accounting for 9.8% of PM2.5 concentrations.The result of positive matrix factor(PMF) analysis suggested four source categories had contributed to the PM2.5 in the urban air,i.e.vehicle emission(27.1%),secondary sulfate and nitrate aerosol(26.8%),industrial emission(26.4%),and biomass burning emission(19.6%),respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?