Abstract:Interpersonal Deception Theory (IDT) proposes that among the strategies deceivers use to create credible messages is information management. Delineated here are five fundamental dimensions along which verbal content and style can be altered to manage information: (1) completeness (informational and conversational), (2) veridicality (actual and apparent), (3) directness/relevance (semantic and syntactic/pragmatic), (4) clarity (semantic and syntactic/pragmatic), and (5) personalization. Two studies employing encoding and decoding methodologies are presented that assess the degree to which (1) senders can vary discourse on demand along these dimensions and (2) receivers (observers) can recognize such variations. Participants in the first experiment engaged in separate truthful and deceptive interviews; during the latter, they enacted one of three different forms of deception (falsification, equivocation, concealment) representing different combinations of the five dimensions. Participants in the second experiment gave truthful and deceptive answers during a single interview and again enacted different deception forms. Participants and observers then rated interviewee responses on the five dimensions. Results from both studies confirmed that deceptive communication is less complete, honest (veridical), direct/relevant, clear, and personalized (attributable to the speaker) than truthful communication. Falsifications were the least truthful but seen as most complete. Equivocations were the least clear and direct/relevant and seen as such. They were also seen as the most personalized. Findings are discussed in light of IDT, McCornack's Information Manipulation Theory, and Jacobs, Dawson, and Brashers' replication of McCornack's work.

The Cooperative Principle Approach to Deception in Verbal Communication

On the Lexical Characteristics of Deception

When lying is more than deceiving: A pragmatic study of lying, based on the relevance-adaptation model

When lying is more than deceiving

Nonverbal cues to deception: insights from a mock crime scenario in a Chinese sample

Interpersonal deception: XII. Information management dimensions underlying deceptive and truthful messages

A multi-dimensional analysis of deception

A Discussion on Conversational Implicature Caused by Violation of Cooperative Principle

A Game-Theoretic Foundation of Deception: Knowledge Acquisition and Fundamental Limits

An empirical evaluation of interpersonal deception theory in a real-world, high-stakes environment

Cooperation Principle and the Formation of Pragmatic Meaning

A Comparison of Deception Behavior in Dyad and Triadic Group Decision Making in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication

Distinguishing deception from non-deception in Chinese speech

To Tell The Truth: Language of Deception and Language Models

Neural Mechanism of Deception and Its Application to Lie Detection: Evidences from Fmri Studies

Detecting Deception through Linguistic Analysis

Honesty Is the Best Policy: Defining and Mitigating AI Deception

Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception

Lying between English and Chinese: An intercultural comparative study

Trust and deception in mediated communication

VIOLATION ON MAXIM OF COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE IN THE SLOGAN