Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical effects of C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty and C2 expansive opendoor laminoplasty in upper cervical(involve or above C2 segment) ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.Methods All of 39 patients (22 males and 17 females) withcervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament up to C2 which causedcompression symptoms were operated with posterior cervical surgery in ourhospital from January 2013 to June 2017.The average age was 55.74+7.91 years old,ranging from 39 to 71 years.Among these patients,21 patients underwent C2 domelike expansive laminoplasty and 18 underwent C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty,the patients in both groups underwent the C3-C7 expansive open-door laminoplasty.The preoperative and postoperative Neck Disability Index (NDI),Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score,the xisual analog scale(VAS) and the space available for the spinal cord (SAC) of C2 segment in X-ray were measured and statistically analyzed.Results All patients were followed up,the follow-up time was from 15 to 63 months (mean 42.3±17.7 months).There was no significant difference in the general condition,NDI,JOA score and JOA score improvement rate between preoperative and postoperative follow-up in 2 groups.There were significant differences in the NDI,JOA,VAS and SAC between preoperative and postoperative follow-up in 2 groups.The VAS score in C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty group 1.52± 1.2 was significantly lower than that in C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty group 2.06±0.87(t=-2.23,P＜0.05),while the SAC in C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty group 14.11±1.023 was significantly higher than that in C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty group 1 L86± 1.014(t=-6.89,P＜0.05).No failure of internal fixation or recurrent compression was found during follow-up.Conclusion For patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament up to C2 or higher level,both C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty and C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty can achieve good results.The SAC in C2 expansive open-door laminoplastygroup was superior to that in C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty group,while the postoperative pain was more obvious.There was no significant difference in postoperative neurological recovery between the two groups.Using C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty could reduce postoperative axial pain than the C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty surgery.For patients withossified tissue in the spinal canal,which occupies more than 50％ of the sagittal diameter of the spinal canal,or with developmental spinal stenosis,C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty may berecommend to get more adequate decompression.

Study on Residual Anterior Cord Compression after Laminoplasty Inhibiting Neurologic Recovery

The Effect of the Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty on the Three-Dimensional Motion and Stiffness of the Cervical Spine

A Clinical Study of C2 Dome-Like Expansive Laminoplasty and C2 Expansive Open-Door Laminoplastyinupper Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

Treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with laminoplasty based on individual accurate transverse diameter of the spinal canal

Extended Laminoplasty for Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Involving the C2 Segment

Comparative Effectiveness and Functional Outcome of C2 Dome-like Expansive <i>Versus</i> C2 Expansive Open-door Laminoplasty for Upper Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament <i>A Retrospective Cohort Study</i>

Effect of the decompressive extent on the magnitude of the spinal cord shift after expansive open-door laminoplasty.

Clinical outcome of laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with K-line (−) in the neck neutral position but K-line (+) in the neck extension position: A retrospective observational study

Residual anterior cord compression after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: evaluation of risk factors according to the most severely stenotic vertebral segment

Comparison of efficacy of laminoplasty and laminectomy combined with lateral mass screw fusion for treatment of cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament

[Application of Intraoperative Spinal Ultrasonography in Cervical Laminoplasty].

Correlation between cervical curvature and spinal cord shift, surgical outcome after expansive opendoor laminoplasty

Analysis of Related Factors of Posterior Shifting of the Spinal Cord after Cervical Laminoplasty

Short-term Clinical Outcome of Modified Expansive Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty Preserving Posterior Extensor Musculature Inserted into C2 and C7 Spinous Process

Measurement and Comparison of Postoperative Anterior Cord Space Between C2-7 and C3-7 Laminoplasty on MRI

Favorable cervical extension capacity preventing loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty due to spontaneous restoration of initial lordosis

[Reoperation for Cervical Myelopathy Duo to Progressing Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligaments in Patients with Expansive Laminoplasty].

[Case-Control Study of Anterior Cervical Decompression Plus Sublevel Fusion and Posterior Cervical Laminodiastv for the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy].

[A case-control study:the clinical efficacy of total laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation and single open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal cord injury without fracture and dislocation]

Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Surgical Outcomes Between Three Types of Modified Muscle-Sparing Laminoplasty and Conventional Laminoplasty for Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Laminoplasty with foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical myeloradiculopathy