DOP25 Antibodies against Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (ANETAs) are associated with more severe disease course in Ulcerative Colitis
E A Mendieta Escalante,D Parada-Venegas,C Roozendaal,M Hermoso,A R Bourgonje,K N Faber,D Gerard
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0065
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background Antibodies against Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (ANETAs) have emerged as markers in multiple autoimmune disorders (i.e. rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus) associated with disease activity. We investigated the presence of ANETAs and their influence on disease course in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Methods Serum samples from UC (n=33), Crohn's Disease (CD; n=28), and healthy controls (HC; n=8) underwent incubation with non-lytic Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) for immunofluorescence microscopy. For clinical relevance, these patients were followed over ten years to track treatment resistance, extraintestinal manifestations, surgeries, and disease recurrence (Table 1). For functional relevance, in vitro generated NETs were exposed to ANETAs, followed by quantifying macrophage-mediated clearance of these ANETA pre-treated NETs by real-time microscopy via pHrodo for 24 hours, as well as assessing pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-8, and IL-23) genetic expression levels in these macrophages. Results Among UC patients, ANETA positivity correlated with high rates of treatment resistance, extraintestinal manifestations, colorectal surgeries, and recurrence of disease like pouchitis (93.3% vs. 6.7%, 61.5% vs. 38.5%; 71.4% vs. 28.6%; 87.5% vs. 12.5%, for ANETA+ and ANETA- UC patients, respectively). CD patients with ANETAs exhibited high rates of resistance to treatment (75% vs 25%) and lower rates of extraintestinal manifestations, colectomy, and disease recurrence (38.1% vs 61.9%, 40% vs 60%, 33.3% vs 66.7%) (Fig 1A). Macrophages displayed robust engulfment of untreated NETs and those treated with healthy control sera, while ANETA-coated NETs exhibited reduced susceptibility to macrophage phagocytosis (Fig 1B). Gene expression analysis revealed a significant upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-8, and IL-23) when NETs were incubated with serum from ANETA-positive individuals compared to sera from healthy controls (p<0.05). Conclusion ANETAs may serve as markers for a distinct subgroup of UC patients characterized by aggressive disease and poorer prognosis. The potential mechanism might involve impaired NETs clearance by, and inducing a proinflammatory response in macrophages. Discrepancies observed between UC and CD suggest diverse pathophysiological mechanisms in both diseases. Further research is imperative to comprehensively understand the underlying pathophysiology, function, and potential clinical applications of ANETAs in IBD.
gastroenterology & hepatology