Abnormal Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve after Coronary Intervention is Associated with Cardiac Marker Elevation

J Herrmann,M Haude,A Lerman,R Schulz,L Volbracht,JB Ge,A Schmermund,H Wieneke,C von Birgelen,H Eggebrecht,D Baumgart,G Heusch,R Erbel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.19.2339
IF: 37.8
2001-01-01
Circulation
Abstract:Background-Residual reduction of relative coronary flow velocity reserve (rCVR) after successful coronary intervention has been related to microvascular impairment. However, the incidence of cardiac enzyme elevation as a surrogate marker of an underlying embolic myocardial injury in these cases has not been studied.Methods and Results-A series of 55 consecutive patients with successful coronary stenting, periprocedural intracoronary Doppler analysis, and determination of creatine kinase (CK; upper limit of normal [ULN] for women 70 IU/L, for men 80 IU/L) and cardiac troponin T (cTnT; bedside test, threshold 0.1 ng/mL) before and 6, 12, and 24 hours after intervention were studied. Postprocedural rCVR was the only intracoronary Doppler parameter that independently correlated with cTnT (r = -0.498, P <0.001) and CK outcome (r = -0.406, P = 0.002). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified a postprocedural rCVR of 0.78 as the best discriminating value, with a sensitivity of 83.3% and 69.2% and a specificity of 79.1% and 76.2% for detection of cTnT and CK elevation, respectively. Stratified according to this cutoff value, the incidence of cTnT elevation was 52.6% in patients with (n = 19) and 5.6% in patients without (n = 36) a postprocedural rCVR <0.78 (P <0.001), associated with a CK elevation >1 rimes the ULN in 36.8% and 5.6% (P = 0.005) of patients, respectively.Conclusions-Cardiac marker elevation can frequently be found after coronary procedures that are associated with a persistent reduction of rCVR, indicating procedural embolization of atherothrombotic debris with microvascular impairment and myocardial injury as a potential underlying mechanism.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?