Abstract:Introduction: In CIED infections, all device material needs to be removed. But, especially in pacemaker-dependent patients it is often not possible to realize a device-free interval for infection remediation. In those patients, different treatment options are available, however the ideal solution needs still to be defined. Methods: This retrospective analysis includes 190 patients undergoing CIED extractions due to infection. Three different treatment algorithms were analyzed: Group 1 included 89 patients with system removal only (System removal group). In Group 2, 28 patients received an epicardial electrode during extraction procedure (Epicardial lead group) while 78 patients in group 3 (contralateral reimplantation group) received implantation of a new system contralaterally during extraction procedure. We analyzed peri- and postoperative data as well as 1-year outcomes of the three groups. Results: Patients in the system removal and epicardial lead groups were significantly older, had more comorbidities, and suffered more frequently from systemic infections than those in contralateral reimplantation group. Lead extraction procedures had comparable success rates: 95.5%, 96.4%, and 93.2% of complete lead removal in the System removal, Epicardial Lead, Contralateral re-implantation group respectively. Device reimplantation was performed in all patients in Epicardial lead and Contralateral reimplantation group, whereas only 49.4% in System removal group received device re-implantation. At 1-year follow-up, freedom from infection and absence of pocket irritation were comparable for all groups (94.7% Contralateral reimplantation group and Epicardial lead group, 100% System removal group). No procedure-related mortality was observed, whereas 1-year mortality was 3.4% in System removal group, 4.1% in Contralateral re-implantation group and 21.4% in Epicardial lead group ( p < 0.001). Conclusion: In patients with CIED infection, systems should be removed completely and reimplanted after infection remediation. In pacemaker-dependent patients, simultaneous contralateral CIED re-implantation or epicardial lead placement may be performed, depending on route, severity and location of infection.

Analysis on clinical materials in patients with post-operation infection after implantation of permanent pacemaker

Detection of bacteria in pocket of permanent pacemaker and analysis of influencing factors

Analysis of complications after pacemaker implantation 82 cases

Cardiac Pacemaker Survey-Twenty Hospitals Pacemaker Implantation Registry in China

Infection remediation after septic device extractions: analysis of three treatment strategies including a 1-year follow-up

Effectiveness of pocket vacuum suction drainage therapy in patients with negative blood-cultured pocket infection after pacemaker implantation

Comparison of efficacy and safety of temporary pacing using active-fixation rersus traditional leads after extraction of infected leads

Identification of Bacteriology and Risk Factor Analysis of Asymptomatic Bacterial Colonization in Pacemaker Replacement Patients

Time interval of reimplantation with post lead extraction in patients with isolated pacemaker pocket in-fection

Effect of Antibiotic Solution Flushing on Prevention of Pacemaker Pocket Infection

Preliminary clinical application of leadless pacemaker in patients after removal of infected pacemaker system

Bridge Pacemaker with an Externalized Active Fixation Lead for Pacemaker‐dependent Patients with Device Infection

[Epicardial Pacemaker Infection Treated by Leads Removal via Re-sternotomy:Report of a Case]

[The efficacy of permanent epicardial pacing in the treatment of pacing-dependent patients with cardiac device related endocarditis].

Comparison of different processing methods of generator pocket in pacemaker replacement

Open-heart surgery to cure cardiac device related endocarditis

Leadless pacemaker implant in patients with pre‐existing infections: Results from the Micra postapproval registry

Infectious Endocarditis, Pulmonary Embolism and Progression of Tricuspid Insufficiency are Threatening Complications of a Cardiac Implantable Device (Сase Report)

The effect of cardiovascular implantable electronic device(CIED)re-implantion time after the pacing leads be extractedby superior vena cava and inferior vena cava approaches because of CIED infection

Impact of COVID-19 infection among patients hospitalized for conventional pacemaker implantation: Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2020

Cardiac device infections: getting to the heart of the matter