Directional association of preclinical, vasoconstrictor assay and clinical results of topical clobetasol formulations 1 , *1

X HUANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2003.11.039
IF: 15.487
2004-01-01
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Abstract:Currently, topical glucocorticosteroids are the most frequently used class of drugs in dermatological practice. Over the years, research has focused on strategies to optimize the delivery vehicle to maximize clinical efficacy while minimizing any associated adverse effects. Recently, a novel topical delivery vehicle, thermolabile foam, has been developed. Two foam-based topical corticosteroid products (betamethasone 17-valerate foam and clobetasol propionate foam) have been approved by FDA for treatment of dermatoses. During the development of these two products, in vitro skin penetration, a vasoconstrictor assay and randomized clinical efficacy study were conducted. Objectives: To compare results of the foam-based clobetasol propionate (0.05%) and another commercially available clobetasol product (clobetasol propionate solution, 0.05%) in the in vitro assay, vasoconstrictor assay and clinical efficacy, and to define the correlation of three commonly used assays. Methods: During the development process, three sets of results were collected. (1) Preclinically, an in vitro flow through system was used to profile the rate of drug penetrating into skin membrane (expressed as peak flux, ng/cm2/hr). (2) A vasoconstrictor assay to determine steroid potency was conducted in 24 healthy subjects in a randomized fashion at a single center. The blanching effects of steroid were monitored by using a chromameter at various timepoints post-application and the maximum skin color change from the baseline was presented as Emax. (3) Clinical efficacy was evaluated in a randomized trial of 188 adult patients with moderate to severe scalp psoriasis treated with a clobetasol product (foam or solution) for 14 days. Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) was used, and the percentage of patients to attain completely clear or almost clear (IGA 0 or 1) was presented. Results: Clobetasol Propionate Foam: Preclinical Peak Flux (ng/cm2/hr) = 16.90, Vasoconstrictor Assay (Emax) = −1.15, Clinical Efficacy (% Patients∗) = 74%. Clobetasol Propionate Solution: Preclinical Peak Flux (ng/cm2/hr) = 8.56, Vasoconstrictor Assay (Emax) = −.71, Clinical Efficacy (% Patients∗) = 63%. ∗With completely clear or almost clear. Conclusion: The results showed that foam-based clobetasol has higher skin penetration, more potent vasoconstriction and higher clinical efficacy response rate when compared to clobetasol solution. Thus, it suggests that in vitro skin penetration could be a very useful assay for evaluating novel formulations of topical corticosteroids.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?