The spatio-temporal relationship of segmental volume and mural strain of left ventricle with wide and narrow QRS complex evaluated by dynamic three-dimensional echocardiography

LUO An-guo,YIN Li-xue,LI Chun-mei,WANG Zhi-gang,WANG Lian-chun,LIN Jia-di,CAI Yan-lang,MENG Qing-guo,ZHANG Tao,LI Xia,LI Lu
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the spatio-temporal relationship of left ventricular segmental volume and mural strain in patients with wide and narrow QRS complex of bundle branch block and cardiac pacing . Methods Eight patients with bundle branch block, 2 patients with VVI pacing, 9 patients with DDD pacing and 18 healthy individuals (control group) underwent the examination of dynamic 3-dimensional volume grey-scale and 2-dimensional tissue Doppler echocardiography. Among them, 3 patients with DDD pacing had a narrow QRS complex (≤130 ms) and the other 16 patients had a wide QRS complex (≥130 ms) on ECG. The segmental volume and mural strain value of left ventricle were measured and calculated along the anterior interventricular septum, anterior and posterior walls of the left ventricle at the basal, middle and apical segments using a QLAB software. Results There was a negative correlation between segmental volume and mural strain at the same segments of the left ventricle in the control group and patients with right bundle-branch block (RBBB) during one cardiac cycle(P<0.05)except for anterior apical and posterior basal segment in control group (in 11% of the segments, P>0.05) and septal basal, anterior apical and posterior middle segment in patients with RBBB (in 22% of the segments, P>0.05). A linear degressive relationship between the changes of segmental volume and mural strain from the basal to apex was demonstrated. However, there was no significant relationship of segmental volume and mural strain in patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB), and patients with wide and narrow QRS complex pacing (P> 0.05 ). The interventricular septum was the most asynchronous position in patients with LBBB, and anterior wall of left ventricle was the most asynchronous positions in patients with cardiac pacing. Conclusions The results demonstrate a synchrony of left ventricular mechanics in patients with RBBB, and an asynchronism of left ventricular mechanical activation in patients with LBBB, wide and narrow QRS complex pacing, which reflects the non-linear remodeling of the spatio-temporal relationship between the left ventricular segmental volume and mural strain.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?